Factors in mode-2 knowledge production in 11 Dutch Academic Collaborative Centres for Public Health (ACCs) | ||
---|---|---|
 | Enabling | Constraining |
Push factors/supply side | 1. ZonMw funding to build an infrastructure for knowledge production (coordinator, steering committee, contractual agreement, working groups) | 1. Perceived pressure of university to publish in high impact journals |
 | 2. University’s role in the production of context-sensitive evidence | 2. University’s requirement for PhD projects |
 | 3. Professorships by special appointment | 3. Difficulty to find external grants for policy-initiated or practice-based research |
 | 4. Tacit knowledge among citizens is being valued more by researchers | 4. Unwillingness of Public Health Service (PHS) directors to really advocate ACC |
 | 5. Post-academic education | |
 | 6. Grants for PhD research projects | |
 | 7. Packaging of evidence-based actionable messages in Dutch | |
Pull factors Demand side | 1. Short-term policy-driven research projects | 1. Limited budget availability for infrastructure, especially for coordinator |
 | 2. Local Alderman for Public Health acting as ACC champion | 2. Limited involvement of local government |
 | 3. Publications in public friendly Dutch journals | 3. Low demand for scientific evidence by policymakers |
Exchange factors | Interactive communication and indispensable linking-pin function with passionate attitude of coordinator | Limited influence of coordinator on decision-making process of local authorities and PHS directors |