Skip to main content

Table 2 The panel ranking of research indicators commonly used in developed settings and how they should apply to clinicians in low-resource settings (n = 19)

From: Development and use of a research productivity assessment tool for clinicians in low-resource settings in the Pacific Islands: a Delphi study

Research performance indicators used to assess performance of academics in high-resource countries

VR ++++

SR ++

SI +

NR 0

Scale

Rank

Research collaborations

15

2

  

3.76

1

National recognition

14

3

  

3.65

2

Research supervision

15

2

3

 

3.35

3=

Contribution to the research environment, e.g. research meetings

13

1

3

 

3.35

3=

Conference presentations

7

10

  

2.82

5

Research funding received

7

7

2

1

2.59

6

International recognition

6

8

3

 

2.53

7

Number of publications

6

6

3

2

2.29

8

Reviewer

3

7

7

 

1.94

9

Peer esteem, e.g. journal editor

3

7

6

1

1.88

10

Article citations

3

5

8

1

1.76

11

Creative works

2

7

3

5

1.47

12

Books published

 

5

10

2

1.18

13

  1. VR, Very relevant; SR, Somewhat relevant; SI, Somewhat irrelevant; NR, Not relevant.
  2. Not all 19 panellists answered every question.