Parameter | Rating categories | Responses during the first validation | Responses during second validation | Total responses |
---|---|---|---|---|
How well did they represent issues related to neonatal health services | Very good | Â | 2 | 2 |
Good | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
Fairly good | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
Not at all good | Â | Â | Â | |
Whether the model was realistic and an imitation of the real world system | Very reasonable | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Reasonable | 4 | 7 | 11 | |
Fairly reasonable | Â | Â | Â | |
Not reasonable | Â | Â | Â | |
Does the model capture and communicate issues in neonatal healthcare service? | Very good | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Good | 2 | 5 | 7 | |
Fairly good | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Not at all good | Â | Â | Â | |
Is the model a useful communication tool concerning neonatal health care issues? | Very useful | 4 | 4 | 8 |
Useful | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
Fairly useful | Â | Â | Â | |
Not at all useful | Â | Â | Â | |
Is the model a tool that can be used by stakeholders in decision making? | Very useful | 3 | 5 | 8 |
Useful | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
Fairly useful | 2 | Â | 2 | |
Not at all useful | Â | Â | Â |