From: A systematic review on current status of health technology reassessment: insights for South Korea
 | United Kingdom | Canada | Australia | Spain |
---|---|---|---|---|
Identification | Selection criteria for medical technologies evaluation in NICE - Claimed additional benefit to patients - Claimed healthcare system benefit - Patient population - Disease impact - Cost considerations - Sustainability | - New evidence (safety, effectiveness) - Geographic variations in care - Provider variations in care (clinical heterogeneity) - Temporal variations in volume (a trend in item volume between time points) - Technology development - Public interest or controversy - Consultation - Nomination - Assess new intervention, displace old - Leakage - Legacy items - Conflict with guidelines - Precedent | - New evidence (safety, effectiveness) - Geographic variations in care - Provider variations in care (clinical heterogeneity) - Temporal variations in volume (a trend in item volume between time points) - Technology development - Public interest or controversy - Consultation - Nomination - Assess new intervention, displace old - Leakage - Legacy items - Conflict with guidelines | Guideline for Not Funding existing health Technologies in healthcare systems - Technology to be used in the centre or place - Technology status known to the applicant - Alternative treatment option available - No absence of care with disinvestment |
Detection criteria - Is currently used (health services portfolio) - Alternative technologies are available |