|
PB.1 Rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for malaria
|
Content accessible enough, but many technical terms
|
Ambiguous statements and many assertions without supporting data
|
Much of the information could have been removed
|
No clear, comprehensible and action-oriented recommendations
|
|
PB.2 Community health workers’ (CHWs) perceptions of their involvement in malaria management
|
Language not adequately adapted, overly technical and variable concepts
|
Insufficient information, title too long and unclear, many ambiguous statements
|
Many unnecessary tables
|
No clear recommendations, but a conclusion
|
|
PB.3 Management of children under five by CHWs
|
Target public not specified, making it difficult to assess whether language is adapted
|
Difficult to grasp the objective of the study
|
Difficulties in understanding what message the researchers were trying to convey
|
No clear recommendations, but a conclusion (presented as a question)
|
|
PB.4 Rapid diagnostic tests and prescribing practices
|
Language not adapted; long sentences and complex title
|
Insufficient information to understand the objective
|
Graphics difficult to understand; several unnecessary tables
|
Inconsistency between recommendations and study objectives
|
|
PB.5 Implementation of the anti-malaria program
|
Technical terms difficult to understand
|
Sufficient information
|
Some information not very relevant for the policy; table and figures improperly positioned in the text
|
No presentation of the key arguments at various points
|
