From: The research–policy–deliberation nexus: a case study approach
Programme | Aims | Research utilisation model |
---|---|---|
Closing the Gap | Divestment of power to regions to tackle Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander disadvantage and close the gap in life expectancy through targeted interventions; Researchers provided initial population health data to inform planning efforts | Customer/Client: • Research utilisation at the outset to inform project • Researchers not involved in the Advisory Committee and had no decision-making power |
Prevention of Violence Against Women | The role of researchers in the PVAW Advisory Committee was to attend meetings and to use their technical and other experience to provide feedback in relation to any of the initiatives that were being developed or implemented; The health promotion objectives were to prevent violence against women | Interactive Model: • Researchers consulted with throughout the process of planning and implementation in an instrumental way • Overlapping roles, high engagement, shared learning |
Neighbourhood Renewal | This governance structure brought together the resources and ideas of researchers, residents, governments, businesses and community groups to tackle disadvantage in areas with concentrations of public housing; It promoted a deliberative forum where local participants had equal decision-making power to researchers | Joint Construction: • Deliberatively democratic, on-going participation from researchers and stakeholders, joint power sharing, high levels of transparency and accountability, participation and decision-making roles equal among researchers/stakeholders |