Skip to main content

Table 1 Number and background of participants/respondents for each data collection technique

From: Qualitative assessment of opportunities and challenges to improve evidence-informed health policy-making in Hungary – an EVIPNet situation analysis pilot

 

Launch event

Focus groups

Semi-structured interviews

Online questionnaires

Researchers

14 (19 invited)

10 (11 invited)

5 (5 invited)

21 (31 sent)

Policy-makers

16 (30 invited)

8 (14 invited)

5 (6 invited)

10 (23 sent)

Other stakeholders (advocacy groups of professionals, patients and providers, clinicians)

2 (4 invited)

3 (3 invited)

3 (3 invited)

0 (0 sent)

Total

32 (53 invited)

21 (28 invited)

13 (14 invited)

31 (54 sent)

Overall response rate

60%

75%

93%

57%

Breakdown by senioritya

 Senior level

31

21

13

29

 Junior level

1

2

Breakdown by job focusb

 Strategic

13

8

9

8

 Operational

19

13

4

23

  1. aSenior level: public officials, including heads of divisions and above, public officials with ‘senior advisor’ title, academics including assistant professors and above, leaders of NGOs; Junior level: not senior level
  2. bDetermined by the research team based on consensus