Table 1 Outcomes of the integrated knowledge translation process as reported by school principals
| Â | % (n) |
|---|---|
Use of research evidence | Â |
 Aware of School Report (n = 18) | 83% (15) |
 Partially or fully read School Report (n = 18) | 52% (11) |
 Thought research evidence in School Report might be useful (n = 11) | 91% (10) |
 Research evidence presented in a way they could understand (n = 10) | 100% (10) |
Conceptual knowledge use | |
 ‘Sometimes’ or ‘often’ thought about the School Report (n = 10) | 70% (7) |
 Made other school staff and partners aware of the School Report (n = 10) | 70% (7) |
 Discussed the School Report with school staff and partners from your school (n = 10) | 70% (7) |
 Discussed the School Report with school staff and partners from other schools (n = 10) | 30% (3) |
 Cited the School Report in school documents (e.g. parent newsletters, continuous school improvement plans) (n = 9) | 44% (4) |
 The School Report introduced a new idea or way of thinking to support health promotion at the school (n = 9) | 67% (6) |
 The School Report changed beliefs about a particular approach to support health promotion (n = 9) | 33% (3) |
Instrumental knowledge use | |
 Attributed the partial of full adoption of a new practice or the implementation of a health promotion practice as a result of the School Report (n = 9) | 89% (8) |