Skip to main content

Table 3 Criteria which were ranked HI by the highest percentage by each profession type

From: Hospital staff perspectives towards health technology assessment: data from a multidisciplinary survey

Profession

Apect of benefit (%/n)

Clinical

Social

Technological

Economical

Total

Lifesaving (77/55)

Improving patient experience (51/36)

Lack of effective alternative technology (70/50)

Efficiency (51/36)

Physician

Lifesaving (93/27)

Improving patient experience (33/10)

Lack of effective alternative technology (74/22)

Efficiency + Manpower savings (37/11)

Nurse

Lifesaving (74/15)

Improving patient experience (74/15)

Lack of effective alternative technology (68/14)

Efficiency + Manpower savings (58/12)

Allied health

Lifesaving (75/3)

Improving patient experience (50/2)

Lack of effective alternative technology (100/4)

Budget savings +Technology that requires a significant investment in infrastructure (50/2)

Engineers

Lifesaving (67/4)

Improving patient experience (33/2)

Lack of effective alternative technology + Completion of a technology already exists at the hospital (67/4)

Technology that requires a significant investment in infrastructure (100/6)

Administrators

Lifesaving (58/7)

Improving patient experience (67/8)

Lack of effective alternative technology (58/7)

Efficiency (67/8)