CFIR domains | Similarities among districts | Specific features | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HD1 | HD2 | HD3 | ||
1. 1. 1. Characteristics of the intervention | - PBF perceived as a foreign intervention | NA | ||
- Difficulty citing the name of the funder | ||||
- Perceptions of a complicated intervention | ||||
2. 1. 1. 1. 1. External context | - Late recourse to care | NA | ||
- Insufficient vaccination coverage of children | ||||
- PBF network not well developed among the health personnel involved in its implementation | ||||
- Presence of NGOs that could contribute to the achievement of PBF objectives | ||||
- Implementation of the Social and Health Development Program | ||||
3. 1. 1. 1. Internal context | - Strong correlation between level of information and level of education | Experience of having been involved in implementing a previous PBF project | First experience of involvement in a PBF project | First experience of involvement in a PBF project |
- Personnel focused on financial incentives | ||||
- Appearance of different forms of engagement towards PBF | ||||
- Perceptible frustration among staff with less training | ||||
4. 1. Characteristics of individuals | - Personnel receptive to change | Arguments in favour of PBF were based on the success of the previous PBF project | Arguments in favour of PBF were based on the values attributed to it and on rumours about the PBF project | Arguments in favour of PBF were based on the values attributed to it and on rumours about the PBF project |
- Perceived link between PBF objectives and professional values held by workers | ||||
5. 1. 1. 1. 1. Implementation process | - Schedule of planned activities not respected | Greater proficiency with PBF tools and content | Low proficiency with PBF tools and content | Low proficiency with PBF tools and content |
- Reforms implemented to maximise results | ||||
- Increased connivance among workers | ||||
- Increased presence of skilled personnel during on-call shifts | ||||
- Recruitment of new personnel by some CSCOMs |