Element [28] | Questions | Data sources |
---|---|---|
Stakeholder engagement | 1. Were key stakeholders who might be affected by the choice of review topics, or seek to use the reviews (such as consumers, health professionals and decision-makers) involved effectively in the decision-making process? | - Project documents (workshop materials, steering group meeting minutes) |
2. Were multiple techniques were used to identify stakeholders? | - Workshop feedback survey | |
3. Were stakeholders offered multiple ways to contribute? | - Communication materials (final report, publications) | |
4. Was CCCG committed to genuine engagement through partnership and empowerment? | ||
5. Were stakeholders satisfied with their level of involvement in the decision-making process? | ||
Use of explicit process | 6. Was the priority-setting process pre-determined and made transparent to stakeholders? | - Project documents (survey and workshop materials) |
7. Were internal and external stakeholders probed for information relevant to priority-setting decisions? | - Communication materials (project webpage, final report) | |
8. Were the methods used to set priorities understandable, transparent and relevant for different stakeholders? | ||
9. Was communication with stakeholders well-coordinated, systematic and well-planned? | - Workshop feedback survey | |
10. Was information about the project communicated effectively using multiple vehicles? | ||
Information management | 11. Was information used to set priorities, including sources used and how it was collected and collated, made explicit to those setting priorities? Was it deemed sufficient? | - Project documents (survey and workshop materials, steering group meeting minutes) |
- Communication materials (publications, project webpage) | ||
Consideration of values and context | 12. Was the mission, vision and values of CCCG used to guide priority-setting decisions, and made explicit? | - Centre 2019 Year in Review Report |
13. Did priority-setting decisions consider CCCG’s strategic directions as a unit? | - Project documents (steering group meeting minutes, project plan) | |
14. Were the (potential) values of stakeholders, both those involved in the project and those not involved, used to guide priority-setting decisions? | ||
- Communication materials (publications, project webpage) | ||
Revision or appeals mechanism | 15. Was there a formal mechanism for reviewing decisions, whereby stakeholders could identify failures and errors or contribute new information? | - Project documents (workshop materials, steering group meeting minutes) |