Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Defining key questions for clinical practice guidelines: a novel approach for developing clinically relevant questions

Original Submission
4 May 2020 Submitted Original manuscript
19 May 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rodrigo Pardo
26 Jun 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nandi Siegfried
16 Jul 2020 Author responded Author comments - Samantha P Chakraborty
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Jul 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Jul 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nandi Siegfried
5 Aug 2020 Author responded Author comments - Samantha P Chakraborty
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Aug 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Sep 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nandi Siegfried
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
4 Sep 2020 Editorially accepted
29 Sep 2020 Article published 10.1186/s12961-020-00628-3

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page