Recommended by | Recommendation |
---|---|
Government, NGO and community stakeholders participating in individual discussions | Include local municipal managers during all stages of prospective action-learning cycles |
Convene stakeholders at the end of each VAPAR cycle for collective reflection and learning | |
Provincial DOH workshop participants | PHC clinic operational managers and CHWs to be included at all stages of the next action-learning cycle of the programme, with a focus on skills exchange |
VAPAR representatives to participate in routine district and subdistrict planning and reporting processes, including development of the district health plan and quarterly performance review | |
Alignment/integration of VAPAR programme into existing health structures at critical levels of engagement, primarily at household/community (CHW/ward-based primary healthcare outreach team) and subdistrict (clinic operational managers, PHC supervisors) level | |
Focus on community participation and contemporary priorities—support strengthening the management model of PHC facility manager, and consider other programmatic priorities such as adolescent and mental health | |
National workshop participants | Refinement of VA with regard to place of death/circumstances of mortality construct |
Continued engagement with CoMMiC to report on progress and inform future development/application and feeding up into national learning |