Skip to main content

Table 2 Rankings of performance management (PM) research directions overall and by end-user group

From: What do end-users want to know about managing the performance of healthcare delivery systems? Co-designing a context-specific and practice-relevant research agenda

 

Research directions (RDs)

End-user group

RD1 Use of PM

RD2 PM in high-performing systems

RD3 Influence of context

RD4 Motivating improvement

RD5 Unintended negative consequences

All end-users (n = 156)

2.90

2.93

2.95

2.68

3.52

CCO cancer staff (n = 50)

2.3

3.0

3.7

2.6

3.5

CCO renal staff (n = 9)

3.2

1.8

3.1

2.6

4.3

Network cancer staff (n = 52)

3.3

3.0

2.6a

2.6

3.5

Network renal staff (n = 36)

3.1

3.2

2.4

2.9

3.2

External end-users (e.g., patients, policy-makers) (n = 9)

2.8

2.1

3.3

2.4

4.3

  1. A lower number indicates a higher priority ranking. The highest priority research direction ranking per stakeholder group is in bold text
  2. aAlthough there was a tie for highest mean ranking among network cancer staff, the median indicated a preference for RD3