Criteria | Judgement |
---|---|
Priority of the problem | Long-term sick leave has an important impact on the worker and the society in terms of productivity. RtW is a recognized priority by policy-makers in Finland |
Benefits and harms | RtW coordination compared to usual care neither increases nor decreases the length of sick leave, and does not increase the number of workers returning to work |
Certainty of the evidencea | Moderate quality evidence for the outcomes: Cumulative sickness absence in workdays for follow-up of 6 months and more than 12 months Proportion who had ever returned to work—long-term follow-up: 12 months Low quality evidence for the outcomes: Time to return to work: for follow-up of 6 months, 12 months and more than 12 months Cumulative sickness absence in workdays—long-term follow-up: 12 months Proportion who had ever returned to work—very long-term follow-up: more than 12 months Proportion at work at end of the follow-up—follow-up: 6 months, 12 months, more than 12 months Very low-quality evidence for the outcomes: Proportion who had ever returned to work—short-term follow-up: 6 months |
Outcome importance | The included evidence does not provide information on stakeholders’ values of a possibly small decrease in the duration of sick leave. Duration of long-term sick leave in Finland lasts on average 106 days. A small decrease of sick leave by 5 days might not be that relevant to the individual worker but might be relevant for the employer, especially of small companies and blue-collar workers |
Balance between desirable and undesirable effects | Coordination of RtW did not have a desirable or undesirable effect on RtW |
Resource use | |
Resource requirements | The analysis of the costs showed that the saving from the reduction of 5 days of sick leave outweighed by 1.6-fold the cost of RtW coordination |
Certainty of the evidence | The analysis of the costs was done as a brief calculation that may not include all important items of the costs and benefits of RtW coordination, such as the costs of implementing the plan |
Impact on health equity | Interventions that increase RtW improve the access to the labour market and decrease inequity between healthy and disabled workers. The effect of usual care and RtW coordination on sick leave might be similar |
Acceptability | The intervention is already a common intervention by occupational health service providers in Finland [24]. We did not evaluate the attitudes of workers, employers and health service providers towards the intervention |
Feasibility | Our survey showed that the intervention might not be implemented according to the recommendations. We did not evaluate important barriers that would prevent the implementation of RtW coordination in Finland |