Skip to main content

Table 1 Scoping review inclusion criteria

From: Co-production practice and future research priorities in United Kingdom-funded applied health research: a scoping review

Inclusion criteria

Definition

Synonyms and search terms

Participants

Any stakeholders involved in applied health research (e.g. researchers, patients, public)

Health research, applied health researcha, health, healthcare, health care, complex health intervention researchb

Intervention

Co-production approach or methodology

Co-production, co-produc*, co-design, co-creation, co-creat*, co-evaluation, co-evaluat*

Context

United Kingdom literature: research conducted in or relevant to United Kingdom context (e.g. systematic reviews that included studies conducted in the United Kingdom)

Limit = United Kingdom

Outcomes

Definitions, typologies or conceptualization of co-production

Key outcomes (conceptual, methodological, impact, health, experiential)

Research implications

 

Type of literature

Any type of published literature including systematic reviews, literature reviews, empirical research (evaluations of co-production or co-produced intervention research), guidelines, opinion or comment pieces

 

Language

English language only

Limit = English language

Date limits

From 2010 onwards, when “co-production” started to appear in the health literature

Limit to year = “2010–2020”

Subsequently limited to 2018–2020 given the large number of hits from initial searches

  1. aApplied health research aims to address the immediate issues facing the health and social care system, bringing research evidence into practice and influencing policy
  2. bInterventions with multiple behavioural, technological and organizational interacting components and nonlinear causal pathways and components that act independently or interdependently