Skip to main content

Table 4 Purpose of model or framework (n = 39)

From: A scoping review to identify and describe the characteristics of theories, models and frameworks of health research partnerships

Authors

Plan

Guide/manage

Implement/conduct

Sustain

Support/enhance

Evaluate

Reflection (self and/or collective)

Policy and practice development

Other

de Crespigny et al. [48]

        

Enhance the reliability and validity of Indigenous research

Bernier et al. [47]

 

       

Hewlett et al. [50]

        

Practical model for collaboration

Anderson et al. [43]

 

       

McKay et al. [55]

        

Conceptual model of board development

Silka et al. [58]

 

  

    

Wallerstein et al. [59]

     

Strengthen the CBPR research agenda on pathways and on relationships that may link CBPR processes and practices to CBPR system and capacity changes and health outcomes, inform research about partnership processes in CBPR epidemiologic or other assessment studies

Jones et al. [52]

        

To engage community and academic partners equally in an initiative to benefit the community while contributing to science

Warburton et al. [60]

 

    

To facilitate good-quality, multidisciplinary research

Abma and Broerse [41]

        

To complete agenda-setting in partnership research

James et al. [51]

        

Lindau et al. [53]

        

Customizable framework for community engagement

Andrews et al. [44]

        

Indicate partnership readiness

Baquet [45]

        

Community and academic engagement in research

Sadler et al. [56]

 

     

Orient and provide a framework for research partners (community and university), train future academic and community members in collaborative health research

Allen et al. [42]

     

   

Baquet et al. [46]

   

     

Deverka et al. [49]

  

     

Prioritize and design partnered CER

Martin del Campo et al. [54]

        

Community consultation on research projects

Shippee et al. [57]

    

  

Understanding and reporting PSUE, a standard structure and language for reporting and indexing

CIHR [61]

        

Establish key concepts, principles and areas for patient engagement to be adopted by all SPOR partners

Frank et al. [62]

     

Identify required elements for PCOR, provide a way to describe patient-centredness in research

King et al. [63]

   

    

Forming a community–academic partnership in a low-income community

Tse et al. [64]

 

       

Belone et al. [65]

    

 

McNeil et al. [67]

       

Di Lorito et al. [68]

        

Good practice for peer research

Sheridan et al. [69]

 

 

   

Disseminate engaged research, evaluate applications for research funding, develop PCOR training materials, monitor research teams

Corbie-Smith et al. [70]

      

Ethical review and conduct of engaged scholarship

Dave et al. [71]

 

  

 

Gousse et al. [72]

      

Hamilton et al. [73]

  

   

Jull et al. [66]

 

      

Lay out steps and create opportunities for community–research collaboration

Evans et al. [74]

        

Involve public members in research

Key et al. [75]

  

   

Researchers can use to identify their level of engagement

Swarbrick et al. [76]

        

How to involve people with dementia in research

Di Lorito et al. [77]

        

Model for good practice in research

Roche et al. [78]

 

    

 

Ward et al. [79]

  

    

Open and build relational spaces

Total

5

14

8

3

5

7

6

7

 
  1. CER comparative effectiveness research, CIHR Canadian Institutes of Health Research, PCOR patient-centred outcomes research, PSUE patient and service user engagement, SPOR Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research