Authors | Plan | Guide/manage | Implement/conduct | Sustain | Support/enhance | Evaluate | Reflection (self and/or collective) | Policy and practice development | Other |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
de Crespigny et al. [48] | Enhance the reliability and validity of Indigenous research | ||||||||
Bernier et al. [47] | ● | ||||||||
Hewlett et al. [50] | Practical model for collaboration | ||||||||
Anderson et al. [43] | ● | ||||||||
McKay et al. [55] | Conceptual model of board development | ||||||||
Silka et al. [58] | ● | ● | |||||||
Wallerstein et al. [59] | ● | ● | ● | Strengthen the CBPR research agenda on pathways and on relationships that may link CBPR processes and practices to CBPR system and capacity changes and health outcomes, inform research about partnership processes in CBPR epidemiologic or other assessment studies | |||||
Jones et al. [52] | To engage community and academic partners equally in an initiative to benefit the community while contributing to science | ||||||||
Warburton et al. [60] | ● | ● | ● | To facilitate good-quality, multidisciplinary research | |||||
Abma and Broerse [41] | To complete agenda-setting in partnership research | ||||||||
James et al. [51] | ● | ||||||||
Lindau et al. [53] | Customizable framework for community engagement | ||||||||
Andrews et al. [44] | Indicate partnership readiness | ||||||||
Baquet [45] | Community and academic engagement in research | ||||||||
Sadler et al. [56] | ● | ● | Orient and provide a framework for research partners (community and university), train future academic and community members in collaborative health research | ||||||
Allen et al. [42] | ● | ||||||||
Baquet et al. [46] | ● | ||||||||
Deverka et al. [49] | ● | Prioritize and design partnered CER | |||||||
Martin del Campo et al. [54] | Community consultation on research projects | ||||||||
Shippee et al. [57] | ● | ● | Understanding and reporting PSUE, a standard structure and language for reporting and indexing | ||||||
CIHR [61] | Establish key concepts, principles and areas for patient engagement to be adopted by all SPOR partners | ||||||||
Frank et al. [62] | ● | ● | ● | Identify required elements for PCOR, provide a way to describe patient-centredness in research | |||||
King et al. [63] | ● | Forming a community–academic partnership in a low-income community | |||||||
Tse et al. [64] | ● | ||||||||
Belone et al. [65] | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||
McNeil et al. [67] | ● | ● | |||||||
Di Lorito et al. [68] | Good practice for peer research | ||||||||
Sheridan et al. [69] | ● | ● | ● | Disseminate engaged research, evaluate applications for research funding, develop PCOR training materials, monitor research teams | |||||
Corbie-Smith et al. [70] | ● | ● | Ethical review and conduct of engaged scholarship | ||||||
Dave et al. [71] | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||
Gousse et al. [72] | ● | ● | ● | ||||||
Hamilton et al. [73] | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||
Jull et al. [66] | ● | Lay out steps and create opportunities for community–research collaboration | |||||||
Evans et al. [74] | Involve public members in research | ||||||||
Key et al. [75] | ● | ● | ● | Researchers can use to identify their level of engagement | |||||
Swarbrick et al. [76] | How to involve people with dementia in research | ||||||||
Di Lorito et al. [77] | Model for good practice in research | ||||||||
Roche et al. [78] | ● | ● | ● | ||||||
Ward et al. [79] | ● | ● | Open and build relational spaces | ||||||
Total | 5 | 14 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 7 |