Skip to main content

Table 3 Characteristics of members: responded to survey and all members

From: How successful was the use of a community of practice for the implementation of evidence-based practices for heart failure within the United States Department of Veterans Affairs: Insights from a formative evaluation

Member role

Survey respondents

(members)

N (%)

All HF Network

members

N (%)

Administration

VACO/VISN leaders

12 (5.5)

66 (4.9)

Site/departmental leaders

35 (16.0)

210 (15.7)

Quality management staff

6 (2.7)

30 (2.2)

Administrators

1 (0.5)

36 (2.7)

Practising clinicians

Physicians

50 (22.8)

408 (30.4)

Nurse practitioners

43 (19.6)

121 (9.0)

Physician assistants

4 (1.8)

17 (1.3)

Nurses

32 (14.6)

267 (19.9)

Pharmacists

15 (6.8)

70 (5.2)

Psychologists

0 (0.0)

8 (0.6)

Researchers

17 (7.8)

70 (5.2)

Others

4 (1.8)

8 (0.6)

Total (%)

219 (100)

1341 (100)

Involvement with QI projects/programmes at own site

Type of QI role

 

Formal role

34 (23.1)

Informal role

35 (23.8)

Both formal and informal roles

78 (53.1)

Member QI role specific to

HF-related QI projects

74 (50.3)

Non-HF-related QI projects

14 (9.5)

All types of QI projects

58 (39.5)

Total (%)

147 (67.7)