References | Aim | Design | Setting |
---|---|---|---|
Boyce et al. [37] | To explore surgeons’ experiences of receiving peer-benchmarked PROMs feedback and to examine whether this information led to changes in their practice | Semi-structured interviews | Orthopaedic surgeons N = 11 (feedback arm from Boyce et al. [28]) |
Prodinger et al. [10] | To examine supporting and hindering factors relevant to integrating PROMs in selected health information systems tailored towards improving quality of care across the entire health system | Semi-structured interviews | Experts related to NHS, England (N = 7) and to SHPR and SKAR, Sweden (N = 3) |
Van der Wees [11] | To inform policy-makers of prudent next steps for implementing patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice and performance measurement programmes in order to maximize their impact on the quality of care | Semi-structured interviews | Clinical practitioners, measure developers, and leaders of performance measurement programmes N = 58 from 37 organizations United States, United Kingdom and the Netherlands |