Skip to main content

Table 9 State of depression GDS three groups in two clusters

From: Effectiveness of a community-integrated intermediary care (CIIC) service model to enhance family-based long-term care for Thai older adults in Chiang Mai, Thailand: a cluster-randomized controlled trial TCTR20190412004

 

Clusters

Intervention arm

Control arm

  

Normal 0–4

Mild depression 5–10

Severe depression 11–15

Normal 0–4

Mild depression 5–10

Severe depression 11–15

  

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

 

1

221

93.64

15

6.36

0

0.00

      
 

2

196

86.34

31

13.66

0

0.00

      
 

3

224

90.69

23

9.31

0

0.00

      
 

4

186

86.11

29

13.43

1

0.46

      
 

5

203

90.63

21

9.38

0

0.00

      
 

6

197

76.36

59

22.87

2

0.78

      
 

7

      

180

84.91

24

11.32

8

3.77

 

8

      

159

90.34

15

8.52

2

1.14

 

9

      

171

86.36

16

8.08

11

5.56

 

10

      

195

88.64

17

7.73

8

3.64

 

11

      

171

87.69

15

7.69

9

4.62

 

12

      

153

77.66

29

14.72

15

7.61

Mean

  

87.3

 

12.5

 

0.21

 

85.93

 

9.68

 

4.39

ICC

0.0218 (0.0002, 0.0434)

P

 < 0.0001

  1. GDS Geriatric Depression Scale, ICC inter-cluster correlation, CI 95% confidence interval, P P value of cluster-adjusted chi-squared test
Back to article page

Health Research Policy and Systems

ISSN: 1478-4505

Contact us