Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of research conducted during the pandemic

From: Ethics of participation and social inclusion of older persons in research: lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore

Project title

Profile of older adult participants

Recruitment methods prior to the pandemic

Recruitment methods during the pandemic

Data collection methods prior to the pandemic

Additional data collection methods during the pandemic

Changes to study timeline due to the pandemic

Study A*

Mixed methods longitudinal evaluation on transitional care (n = 150)

– Frequently readmitted older persons (aged 50+)

– Lower income bracket, living in public rental housing

– No cognitive impairment; can answer independently

– Inpatient recruitment at the hospital wards; on-site recruitment

– No change

– Face-to-face interviews

– Online

– Voice call

– Videoconferencing

– 12-month hold in data collection

– 12-month study extension granted

Study B*

Longitudinal qualitative evaluation of an intergenerational befriending programme (n = 20)

– Older persons (aged 50+) who have been identified by community providers as socially isolated

– No cognitive impairment; can answer independently

– Referrals from community providers

– Door-to-door knocking

– Recruitment concluded prior to pandemic

– Face-to-face interviews

– Voice call

– Videoconferencing

– 6-month hold in data collection

– 6-month study extension granted

Study C

Qualitative study on care integration for older persons (n = 95)

– Older persons (aged 50+) receiving two or more services from a community provider

– Lower income bracket, living in public rental housing

– No cognitive impairment; can answer independently

NA

– Referrals from community providers

– Phone recruitment

NA

NA

NA

Study D

Qualitative evaluation of a functional screening programme (n = 120)

– Older persons (aged 50+) who have undergone a nationwide screening programme

– No cognitive impairment; can answer independently

NA

– Referrals from regional healthcare systems

– Phone recruitment

– On-site recruitment with strict COVID-19 safety protocols enforced

NA

NA

NA

Study E

Qualitative study on social isolation on loneliness (n = 80)

– Older persons (aged 60+)

– No cognitive impairment; can answer independently

NA

– Referrals from a previous national survey (participants who consented to being re-contacted for similar future studies)

– Phone recruitment

– NA (study not started)

– Face-to-face interviews

– Voice call

– Videoconferencing

– 6-month extension to account for limited manpower due to COVID-19, and research limitations stemming from nationwide safe management measures

Study F*

Longitudinal quantitative study on caregiving (n = 1085)

– 588 care recipients (aged 75+) who have received human assistance for their activities of daily living/instrumental activities of daily living (ADLs/IADLs)

– May have cognitive impairment; may receive assistance to answer

– 497 current or potential caregivers (aged 50+)

– No cognitive impairment; can answer independently

– Referrals from two previous national surveys of older persons in Singapore (participants who consented to being re-contacted for future studies)

– Letter of invitation sent to place of residence

– Door-to-door knocking

– Phone recruitment

– Phone recruitment

– Face-to-face interviews

Offered on ad-hoc basis:

– Online

– Voice call

– Videoconferencing

– Mailed-in survey

Offered to all:

– Online

– Voice call

– 3-month hold in data collection

– 18-month study extension granted

Study G

Longitudinal qualitative study on caregiving (n = 60)

– Older persons (aged 50+) who are caregivers to other older persons (aged 50+)

– No cognitive impairment; can answer independently

NA

– Referrals from Study F (participants who consented to being re-contacted for similar future studies)

– Phone recruitment

NA

NA

NA

  1. *Studies that were in progress when the pandemic began
  2. NA: not applicable