Skip to main content

Table 4 Pragmatic tool evaluation consolidated scores (n = 58 tools)

From: Tools for assessing health research partnership outcomes and impacts: a systematic review

Tool evaluation criteria

Present (n)

Absent (n)

Cannot answer (n)

Score (%)

Scientific rigour

 SR1

Based on systematic literature review?

10

41

7

17%

 SR2

Based on the experiences or expertise of partners?

32

25

1

55%

 SR3

Based on a conceptual or theoretical framework?

52

6

·

90%

 SR4

Is there evidence of tool validity? (any source)

52

6

·

90%

 SR5

Is there evidence of tool reliability? (any source)

54

4

·

93%

Scientific rigour domain score

Mean

3.58

Std dev

0.87

Range

1–5

Partner perspective

 PP1

Partners involved as co-designers?

34

23

1

59%

 PP2

Tool designed to be self-administered by partners?

56

2

·

97%

 PP3

Assessment results must be reported back to partners?

16

41

1

28%

 PP4

Tool assesses level of partner involvement?

16

42

·

28%

 PP5

Tool captures the influence of partners?

44

14

·

76%

Partner perspective domain score

Mean

2.84

Std dev

1.04

Range

1–5

Comprehensiveness

 C1

Tool documents partnership context?

56

2

·

97%

 C2

Tool assesses partnership process?

55

3

·

95%

 C3

Tool documents partnership outcome(s) and/or impact(s)?

58

0

·

100%

 C4

Tool monitors the partnering process at multiple moments?

19

37

2

33%

 C5

Tool consists of open- and closed-ended questions?

32

25

1

55%

Comprehensiveness domain score

Mean

3.79

Std dev

0.75

Range

2–5

Usability

 U1

Tool purpose stated?

58

0

·

100%

 U2

Tool freely accessible?

29

29

·

50%

 U3

Tool available in a readily usable format?

36

22

·

62%

 U4

Tool easy to read and understand?

31

26

1

53%

 U5

Tool accompanied by instructions?

33

25

·

57%

Usability domain score

Mean

3.19

Std dev

1.38

Range

1–5

Overall D1–D4 total score

Mean

66.64

Std dev

15.54

Range

35–90

  1. (·) conceptual underpinnings not explicitly identified