Skip to main content

Table 1 Major elements of the case studies

From: Improving institutional platforms for evidence-informed decision-making: getting beyond technical solutions

 

Regional public health networks in South-East Asia

Citizen panels in Uganda

Regional capacity-building in West Africa

Multilateral collaboration for One Health in Africa

Focus

Cross-border collaboration in infectious disease control

Voice and accountability in public policy

Maternal, newborn & child health policy

Intersectoral coordination for animal, environmental and human health

Locus

Mekong Basin

Uganda

ECOWAS region

WHO African Region

Scope

Regional public health cooperation

Reform of teachers’ professional code of conduct

Use of evidence in MNCH policy-making

Intersectoral surveillance, preparedness and response

Stakeholders

National governments, health sector managers and workers, communities, international organizations

Education Service Commission and educationists

ECOWAS Member State ministries of health, health researchers, international partners

WHO/African Region Member States’ ministries

Brokers

ADB, ASEAN, Rockefeller Foundation, WHO SEARO, WHO WPRO

ACRES

WAHO

United Kingdom FCDO

Primary intervention

Support to cross-border cooperation for infectious disease prevention and control

Empowering grassroots stakeholders to enable participation in high-level policy-making processes

Coordination and coproduction of tailored knowledge transfer strategies in each Member State (e.g. training, norm shifting, networking, top-down changes to organizational procedures)

Sensitization of stakeholders and training on priority competencies related to One Health

Major insights

International brokering institutions can facilitate the sharing of public health data and information across borders to address common health issues

Citizen panels are a pathway that creates trust enough for citizens’ direct input into a high-level policy process

Effectiveness of individual and organizational capacity-building for EIPM is limited in the absence of enabling institutional and political environments

Institutional as well as capacity and interpersonal considerations inform development of priorities in each country

Major challenges

Interoperability, regulatory barriers, sustainability & capacity constraints,

Sustaining these pathways as a more regular approach to public policy engagement

Technical capacity, political leadership and durability of organizational evidence “cultures”

Technical & governance capacity, divergent sectoral priorities

  1. ACRES Center for Rapid Evidence Synthesis, ADB Asian Development Bank, ASEAN Association of Southeast Asian Nations, ECOWAS Economic Community of West African States, EIPM evidenced-based policy-making, FCDO Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, MNCH maternal, newborn and child health, WAHO West African Health Organization, WHO SEARO WHO Regional Office for South-East Asia, WHO WPRO WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific