Table 3 The 12 equilibrium-related concepts for HiAP governance identified in this study, categorized by dimension
From: Equilibrium in the governance of cross-sectoral policies: how does it translate into practice?
Literature review | Case study |
|---|---|
Dimension 1: Degree of crossings between two types of knowledge | |
 Knowledge of bonding zones | Fitting into an ecosystem of related plans |
 Sectoral actions informed by a flow of multidisciplinary inputs | Working with an acknowledged dissymmetry in the format of collective leadership |
Dimension 2: Combination of formal and informal relational positioning | |
 Government accountability to implement a mandate with unbound extra-governmental actors | Mix of formal and informal roles with policy makers |
Dimension 3: Intensity of collective work to Do-it-Yourself practical solutions | |
 Seeking collective problem solving in the pursuit of a set agenda | Mixing tangible and intangible aspects |
Dimension 4: Amplitude of kinetic effects from the collaborative governance | |
 Propagation of policy principles beyond the inner circle of partners | Sustainability of lessons learned |
Dimension 5: Tolerance to variable engagement from partners, in their form and intensity | |
 Taking advantage of controlled entities for autonomous co-management | Coordination of individual organizational capacities |