Table 2 Assessment results per criterion of both substantive and methodological-theoretical research topics
Substantive research topics (n = 46) | Methodological-theoretical research topics (n = 30) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average rating score of all topics | Average nr. of respondents per topic | Share of assessments “I cannot assess this” | Average rating score of all topics | Average nr. of respondents per topic | Share of assessments “I cannot assess this” | ||
Criterion S1: Improving health | 1.87 95% CI: [1.85; 1.90] | 81 | 4% | Criterion M1: Impact on public health research | 2.04 95% CI: [2.00; 2.07] | 77 | 4% |
Criterion S2: Health justice | 1.95 95% CI: [1.92; 1.98] | 80 | 5% | Criterion M2: Impact on public health practice | 2.07 95% CI: [2.03; 2.10] | 76 | 5% |
Criterion S3: Insufficient research | 2.05 95% CI: [2.02; 2.08] | 73 | 12% | Criterion M3: Potential for innovative insights | 2.10 95% CI: [2.06; 2.13] | 73 | 9% |