Skip to main content

Table 2 Implementation considerations for different KM tools and mechanisms 

From: Knowledge management tools and mechanisms for evidence-informed decision-making in the WHO European Region: a scoping review

 

Facilitators/benefits

Major challenges/barriers

Knowledge generation

- Data availability [16, 18, 19]

- Data completeness [16, 18, 19]

- Up-to-date data [16, 18, 19]

- Standardization and regularity of data collection and reporting mechanisms [16, 18, 19, 26]

- Policy relevance [19]

- Training [26]

- Missing data [16]

Knowledge storage

- Use of computerization [28]

- Use of standard terminology

- Better design of reporting systems [39]

- Standardization and harmonization of data collected [39, 151]

- Re-evaluation of the case definition [39]

- Data completeness and accuracy [44]

- Clear methodology for the development of a registry [34

- Availability of a central contact point [32]

- Ability to share data with regulatory authorities [32]

- Linkages to external databases [151]

- Access to and ownership of original data [62]

- Training of personnel and users [32]

- Confidentiality of data [62]

- Interactions with variety of stakeholders [62]

- Political buy-in [32]

- Lack of mandatory notification requirement [39]

- Lack of standardized definition for the disease [39]

- Limited funding [62, 151]

- Limited staff training [62]

- Poor data quality [44]

Knowledge processing

- Applicability of the evidence to the context [77, 78]

- Length and language of the summary [77, 78]

- Standardized approach [72, 73]

- Team with complementary skills and expertise [72, 73]

- Expertise of external partners [72, 73]

- Institutionalizing the use in decision-making [82]

- Difficulties of the statistical and scientific terms [77, 78]

Knowledge transfer

- Ensuring regularity of dialogues [103, 104]

- Follow up with stakeholders afterwards [103, 104]

- Applicability of evidence [114]

- Availability of relevant data and research [114]

- Improved dissemination and access to research [114, 130]

- Administrative support [114]

- Training of personnel [114]

- Research co-production [114, 130]

- Joint knowledge agenda [131]

- Research-led by people embedded in the contexts in which the results can be used [114, 130]

- Recognizing the role of contextual factors [105, 106]

- Availability of resources [105, 106]

- Time constraints [114, 115]

- Lack of funding and limited resources [114, 115]

- Lack of priority on the policy agenda [114, 115]

- Limited availability of data [152]

- Uncertainty about potential data sources [152]

- Lack of skilled policymakers [114]

- Insufficient institutional research capacity [114]

- Opposing interests [115]