Impact of the workforce allocation on the technical performance of mental health services: the collective case of Helsinki-Uusimaa (Finland)

Table 3 Relative technical efficiency (RTE) statistics per service type

Service type (DESDE codes)*	Efficiency average	Efficiency standard deviation	Efficiency error	Efficiency error percentage (%)	Probability of being efficient	Probability of being weakly efficient	Probability of being inefficient	Probability of RTE greater than 0.75
R1–R2	0.967	0.001	0.0008	0.0821	0.0622	0.013	0.9248	0.9992
R1	0.972	0.004	0.0026	0.2716	0.1445	0.0245	0.831	0.992
R2	0.966	0.001	0.0009	0.0885	0.0531	0.0117	0.9352	1
R9–R13	0.901	0.001	0.0009	0.0994	0.0074	0.0386	0.954	0.9121
R9	0.956	0.009	0.0068	0.7205	0.033	0.01	0.957	0.974
R11	0.889	0.002	0.0014	0.1601	0.0046	0.0034	0.9921	0.9121
R12	0.906	0.002	0.0013	0.1441	0.0105	0.005	0.9845	0.8941
R13	0.967	0.006	0.0042	0.4349	0.008	0.5035	0.4885	0.953
O8–O10	0.929	0.0009	0.0006	0.0667	0.0145	0.0572	0.9284	0.9488
O8	0.992	0.0006	0.0005	0.0457	0.0073	0.6693	0.3233	1
O9	0.921	0.0011	0.0008	0.087	0.0128	0.0045	0.9827	0.9395
O10	0.959	0.0027	0.0019	0.1983	0.0397	0.024	0.9363	1

*The definition of the DESDE codes is provided in Table 1. Elements underlined group the services of the same typology. Bold numbers highlight relevant differences

ISSN: 1478-4505