Skip to main content

Table 4 Perceived influence of the form of research evidence

From: Disseminating health research to public health policy-makers and practitioners: a survey of source, message content and delivery modality preferences

Response option

Policy-makers (n = 71)

Practitioners (n = 70)

Estimate

95% CI

All (n = 141)

Mean (SD)

Rank

Mean (SD)

Rank

Mean (SD)

Rank

Peer-reviewed publications

22 (15.1)

1

23 (15.1)

1

−1.29 (−6.33, 3.74)

22 (15.1)

1

Reports

16 (9.6)

2

13 (8.8)

2

3.00 (−0.06, 6.05)

15 (9.3)

2

Policy briefs

15 (9.4)

3

10 (10.0)

4

5.00 (1.77, 8.20)

12 (9.9)a

3

Plain language summaries

10 (10.3)

4

13 (12.1)

3

−2.39 (−6.13, 1.34)

12 (11.2)

4

Infographics

7 (8.9)

6

9 (9.1)

5

−1.55 (−4.53, 1.43)

8 (9.0)

5

Decision support tools or resources

8 (7.7)

5

8 (8.2)

7

−0.12 (−2.78, 2.52)

8 (7.9)

6

Workshops or conferences

7 (5.8)

8

9 (8.1)

6

−1.44 (−3.79, 0.90)

8 (7.0)

7

Meetings (in person or technology enabled)

7 (5.8)

7

8 (7.5)

8

−0.87 (−3.10, 1.36)

8 (6.7)

8

Organizational websites

4 (4.4)

9

4 (4.7)

9

−0.03 (−1.55, 1.49)

4 (4.5)

9

Media (traditional or social)

3 (4.4)

10

3 (4.7)

10

−0.27 (−1.78, 1.23)

3 (4.5)

10

  1. aDifference in scores allocated by policy-makers and practitioners based on the results from t-tests