Fig. 1From: Opportunities to improve the adoption of health-related quality of life evidence as part of the French Health Technology Assessment processThe three countries studied differ substantially in the HRQoL scales preferred and in how this evidence is assessed. Comparison of HAS [12], NICE [23] and IQWiG [15] methods guides, including an overall assessment of the approach, acceptance of open-label data, requirements for end-point hierarchy, acceptance of real-world evidence, preference of generic or disease-specific HRQoL scales, requirements for instrument validations, thresholds for minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and guidelines for missing dataBack to article page