Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Strategies for engaging older adults and informal caregivers in health policy development: A scoping review

Author(s); country

Study objectives

Study type/design

Participants characteristics

Duration

Engagement strategies

Spiers et al., 2021; UK

To understand what matters to people living with multiple long-term conditions and identify priorities for future research

Multi-methods design

Older adults with multiple long-term conditions (age 80 years and older) and their informal caregivers (n = 130)

One-off (not clear)

Survey interview workshop

O’Keefe and Hogg, 1999; UK

To develop ways of reaching house-bound people and enabling them to give their views in planning and monitoring health and social care

Case study design

House-bound older adults (age 70 years and older) and their informal caregivers (n varied at different points in time throughout the project)

On-going (6 years). Focused on building infrastructure for user involvement

Survey Interview Group discussions

Telephone conferencing

Keogh et al., 2021; Ireland

“To create a pathway for the voice and experiences of people with dementia and family caregivers to influence upcoming legislation on home caregivers currently represented through advocacy but not through direct voice using two innovative methods” [17]

Qualitative research design

Older adults with dementia (age 65 years and older; n = 10; 5 males, 5 females) and informal caregivers (age not reported; n = 28; 5 males, 23 females)a

One-off involvement but with previous years of discussion with people with dementia

Policy cafe (2.5 h)

Careers’ assembly (1 day)

Policy café carers’ assembly

Kaambwa et al., 2015; Australia

To provide empirical evidence on the features of consumer-directed care (CDC) most important to older adults and their informal caregivers

Quantitative research design

Older adults (mean age 80 years; n = 87; 75% females) and caregivers (mean age 74 years; n = 30; 53% females)

One-off (not clear)

Discrete choice experiment

Jowsey et al., 2011; Australia

To compare the recommendations for chronic illness care made in the National Health and Hospital Reform Commission (NHHRC) final report with suggestions made by people with chronic illness and family caregivers of people with chronic illness in a recent Australian study

Qualitative research design

Older adults with chronic illnesses (age 65 years and older; n = 52) and family caregivers (n = 14)b

One-off (40–90 min)

Semi-structured interviews

Harrison et al., 2021; UK

To explore the use of photo-elicitation to involve older adults on the issue of age-friendliness in a rural area

Qualitative visual methodologies

Older adults (age 60 years and older; n = 13; 10 females, 3 males)c

Ongoing (6 months). Authors reported that participants continued as co-researchers

Photo-elicitation

Gauvin et al., 2019; Canada

To engage older adults with complex health and social needs, and their caregivers, to improve hospital-to-home transitions

Qualitative facilitated panel discussions

Older adults with complex needs (n = 8) and their caregivers, (n = 4)d

One-off (1 day)

Citizen panel

Degeling et al., 2018; Australia

“To elicit informed views from Australian women aged 70–74 regarding the acceptability of ceasing to invite women their age to participate in government-funded mammography screening” [46]

Qualitative research design

Women aged 70–74 years with no personal history of breast cancer (n = 34)

One-off (2 days)

Community juries

Chuengsatianup et al., 2019; Thailand

“(1) To examine how public participation in health policy can be actualized through a citizens jury as an operational model

(2) To understand the strengths and weaknesses of the ways in which the idea was made operational, and

(3) To provide recommendations for further use of the model” [29]

Qualitative research design

Caregivers of older adults (age 35–75 years; n = 12; 5 females, 7 males)

One-off (4 days)

Citizens’ jury interviews

Focus group discussions

Chappell, 1997; Canada

To understand views of older adults on Pharmacare reference-based policy

Qualitative research design

Focus group: older adults (age 65 years and older; n = 51; 30 females and 21 males

Interviews: Older adults (age 65 years and older; n = 1699)

One-off (focus group not clear; telephone interviews 30 min)

Focus group discussions

Telephone interviews

Buman et al., 2012; USA

To describe a method for engaging older adults in policy regarding food and physical activity

Qualitative visual methodology

Older adults (age 65 years and older; n = 9–12)

Ongoing (1 year and 3 months)

Photovoice and audio recordings

  1. a7 out of 10 older adults were aged 65 years and older
  2. b64% of the study participants were between 65 and 85 years and the remaining 36% were below 65 years
  3. cMost of the participants were reported to be 65 years and older
  4. d9 out of the 12 participants (9 females, 3 males) were 65 years and older