Table 3 Comparison of performance grades between various service object and undertaker groups (n/%)
Characteristics (n) | Grades | Z/P-value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poor | Average | Good | Excellent | ||||
Service object | Region | Southern regions (108) | 15/13.9 | 33/30.6 | 14/13.0 | 46/42.6 | -0.328/0.743 |
Central regions (58) | 12/20.7 | 13/22.4 | 6/10.3 | 27/46.5 | |||
Northern regions (140) | 25/17.9 | 38/27.1 | 18/12.9 | 59/42.1 | |||
Ageing group | 15% ~ < 20% (74) | 11/14.9 | 23/31.1 | 6/8.1 | 34/45.9 | 0.005/0.996 | |
20% ~ < 25% (100) | 16/16.0 | 30/30.0 | 15/15.0 | 39/39.0 | |||
25% ~ 30% (132) | 25/18.9 | 31/23.5 | 17/12.9 | 59/44.7 | |||
Advanced ageing group | 13% ~ < 14% (112) | 23/20.5 | 28/25.0 | 22/19.6 | 39/34.8 | 2.429/0.015 | |
14% ~ < 15% (104) | 20/19.2 | 32/30.8 | 9/8.7 | 43/41.3 | |||
15% ~ 18% (90) | 9/10.0 | 24/26.7 | 7/7.8 | 50/55.6 | |||
Undertaker | Profession | Doctors/preventive medicine workers (37) | 3/8.1 | 12/32.4 | 4/10.8 | 18/48.6 | -1.502/0.133 |
Nurses (161) | 29/18.0 | 40/24.8 | 21/13.0 | 71/44.1 | |||
Social workers (70) | 10/14.3 | 19/27.1 | 10/14.3 | 31/44.3 | |||
Others (38) | 10/26.3 | 13/34.2 | 3/7.9 | 12/31.6 | |||
Training year | 2017 (69) | 13/18.8 | 16/23.2 | 14/20.3 | 26/37.7 | 1.431/0.152 | |
2018 (92) | 14/15.2 | 35/38.0 | 10/10.9 | 33/35.9 | |||
2019 (145) | 25/17.2 | 33/22.8 | 14/9.7 | 73/50.3 | |||