Table 3 List of frameworks

Bednarczyk et al. [76]

Practice—provider—patient (P3) model

Provide a framework for the development, implementation and evaluation of preventive care promotion interventions.

Best et al. [43]

Integrative framework for community partnering

Help to understand the interplay among individual-, family-, organizational-, and community-level factors.

Cambon and Alla [33]

Intervention system theory

Support with evaluating the interventional system within a theory-driven paradigm.

Campbell et al. [31]

Framework for designing and evaluating complex interventions

Support with the design of randomized controlled trials of complex interventions.

Carroll et al. [45]

A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity

Support with measuring implementation fidelity and understanding its place in the process of intervention implementation.

Chen [38]

The bottom-up approach to integrative validity: a new prospective for program evaluation

Offers a model for program evaluation and improved validity.

Craig et al. [39]

The medical research council guideline

Offers guidance for developing and evaluating complex interventions.

Damschroder et al. [36]

The consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR)

Guide systematic research that supports rapid-cycle evaluation of the implementation of health care delivery interventions.

Eslava-Schmalbach et al. [37]

Equity-focussed implementation research for health programs; EquIR

Reduce or prevent the increase of existing inequalities during implementation.

Glasgow et al. [42]

The reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance (RE-AIM) framework

Guide the planning and evaluation of programmes.

Gonot-Schoupinsky and Garip [46]

FRAME-IT

Support the planning and design of early-stage interventions, including constructs such as feasibility, acceptability and tailorability.

Green and Kreuter [34]

The PRECEDE-PROCEED model

Support the assessment of health needs for designing, implementing and evaluating health promotion and other projects.

Gurewich, Garg, and Kressin [32]

The objectives, audience/insight, strategy/ideas (OASIS) framework

Map the known and hypothesized pathways by which unmet social need screening and referral interventions may impact outcomes.

Hennessey Lavery et al. [37]

The Community Action model

Provide communities with a framework to acquire the skills and resources to plan, implement and evaluate health-related actions and policies.

Hyner [77]

A procedural model for planning and evaluating behavioural interventions

A model for planning, implementing and evaluating health behaviour change strategies.

Jolley et al. [50]

Framework for planning and evaluating community participation, collaborative partnership and equity

Support the assessment and evaluation of community participation, collaborative partnership and equity.

Kitson et al. [40]

The PARIHS framework

Guide research implementation by looking into evidence, context, and facilitation.

Leask et al. [25]

PRODUCES framework

Identifies key principles and recommendations for co-creation public health interventions.

Lo and Karnon [41]

In-DEPtH framework

Support health agencies to commission services that are evidence-based, contextually relevant and stakeholder engaged.

Marckmann et al. [35]

Putting public health ethics into practice: a systematic framework

An ethical framework to guide professionals in planning, conducting, and evaluating PH interventions.

Masso et al. [47]

Evolution of a multilevel framework for health program evaluation

Guide the evaluation of health programmes.

Michie et al. [78]

The behavioural change wheel

Guide and improve the design and implementation of evidence-based behaviour change interventions.

MMWR [54]

Framework for programme evaluation in public health

To guide public health professionals in their use of programme evaluation.

Nguyen et al. [79]

Scale-up readiness assessment framework

Guide the process of scaling of a population health intervention.

O’Connor-Fleming et al. [47]

A framework for evaluating health promotion programmes

To support practitioners with the evaluation of health promotion programmes.

Racher and Annis [48]

The community health action (CHA) model

To guide the community assessment, planning, implementation and evaluation of the process.

Titler [51]

Translation Science and Context

A guide to help assess context in translation science.

Wilson et al. [49]

The knowledge to action framework

Provide support for the identification of decision points, interactions, and supporting structures to enable to move knowledge to sustainable action.

Zucca et al. [52]

Assessment framework for pre-implementation policy evaluation

Supporting the recognition of key mechanisms that can enhance the implementation of complexity approaches to study early-stage policy implementation in other contexts.