Skip to main content

Raising the contraceptive prevalence rate to 50% by 2025 in Pakistan: an analysis of number of users and service delivery channels

Abstract

Background

Pakistan is the fifth most populous country in the world, with a population that is growing at 2.4% annually. Despite considerable political will, including a national commitment that was endorsed by the president to raise the contraceptive prevalence rate (CPR) to 50% by 2025, it has stagnated at around 30–35%. Much of the dialogue on raising CPR is hypothetical and revolves around percentage point change rather than an actual number of women that must be served.

Methods

The Demographic and Health Survey 2017–18 (DHS 2017–18) provides information about the channels through which users receive family planning (FP) services and disaggregates this information at the provincial level. Proportions of users from each of these channels were multiplied by the Pakistan Census-2017 populations to arrive at the number of users. These users were compared with the total FP users and the number of women that had used any FP service in the past 12 months. Linear estimations of population were applied to calculate population numbers in 2025.

Results

The national target of 50% CPR by 2025 translates to a population of 20.02 million users. Currently, 11.26 million married women of reproductive age (MWRA) use any method, 8.22 million use a modern method and 4.94 million received this service in the past 12 months. Of these, 2.7 million did so from social marketing outlets, 0.76 million from public sector outreach through lady health workers (LHWs), 0.55 million from private sector and 0.88 million from public sector facilities. However, arriving at the CPR target means expanding annual service delivery from 4.94 to 13.7 million users. Since social marketing and LHW outreach may have become saturated, only public and private health facilities are the likely channels for such an expansion.

Conclusions

We demonstrate triangulation of the survey data with the census data as a simple policy analysis tool that can help decision-makers estimate the quantum of services they must provide. Such an analysis also allows an understanding of the utilization patterns of each of these channels. In Pakistan’s context, underutilization of funds and existing facilities suggests that increased funding or more providers will likely not be helpful. The policy changes that will likely be most effective include adding outreach to support existing public and private sector facilities while ensuring that procurement of commodities is prioritized.

Peer Review reports

Background

The global population is starting to stabilize after rapid expansion in the past two centuries [1, 2]. However, fertility rates remain high for many developing countries, where the population growth at times outpaces any gains in economic development, education and health, impacts the quality of life by reducing access to these essential services and even leads to violence and extremism [3, 4].

Pakistan is one such example. It is the world’s fifth most populous country, and its current population growth rate of 2.4% sets it on a path where its population will increase from the current 208 to 310 million by 2050 [5, 6]. This will profoundly impact Pakistan’s socioeconomic status and environment, and affect its ability to achieve its Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), especially SDG 3 (good health and well-being) [7].

To address this rapid population growth, Pakistan committed at the London Summit on Family Planning 2012 to raise its contraceptive prevalence rate (CPR) to 55% by 2020 [8]. This commitment has since been institutionalized nationally in the recommendations of the Council of Common Interests (CCI) and revised at 50% by 2025 [9]. However, despite political commitment, allocated budgets and large-scale family planning (FP) programmes, Pakistan’s CPR has remained stagnant in the 30–35% range since 2007 [9,10,11,12].

The current debate on improving CPR in Pakistan revolves around percentage point changes rather than the actual number of users that must be served. This hides the quantum of changes needed, along with the specificity of what services are needed, in which quantities and at what locations. The numbers-based approach helps us quantify the actual number of users needed to reach 50% CPR, which is directly linked with service delivery channels that help us determine number of users per channel. Therefore, representing quantity of users needed provides a more precise picture for strategy development of FP programming and population policy-making.

We use data from the Population Census 2017 of Pakistan and the Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) 2017–18 to outline the abovementioned argument. We also propose to initiate a secondary discussion on the relative roles and additional number of users required for the four different service delivery channels, such as public and private facilities, social marketing (pharmacies, markets, shops, etc.) and public sector outreach through lady health workers (LHWs) who increase awareness about FP services through door-to-door visits. FP services are provided free of cost in public facilities and through LHWs; however, these services are self-funded at private facilities and social marketing sites [13, 14].

Methods

We used data on modern FP method users from the Woman’s Questionnaire of the Pakistan DHS 2017–18. Modern methods are classified as short-term and long-term methods. Short-term methods include male condoms, contraceptive pills, and lactation amenorrhea methods, whereas long-term methods include male and female sterilization, intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCDs), implants and ligation. DHS data are used to understand the various channels from which married women of reproductive age (MWRA) receive their contraceptives and services, disaggregated by province (Punjab, Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa [KP], Balochistan and Islamabad). All our national analyses excluded the autonomous regions of Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) and Gilgit-Baltistan (GB).

Since DHS uses a stratified two-stage random sampling design, we incorporated design effects in our analyses and used the provided sampling weights such that our sample was representative of populations in each province [10]. We also took CPR targets for 2025 at the provincial and national levels as recommended by CCI [15], which are given as Punjab (54%), Sindh (47%), KP (46%), Balochistan (36%), Islamabad (62%) and national (50%). We took population numbers of MWRA aged 15–49 years for all provinces from the Population Census-2017 of Pakistan [16].

First, we cross-tabulated weighted sources of modern FP methods and types of methods currently being used at national levels and across provinces. Then we integrated and converted these sources of modern FP methods from DHS into four main channels: public facility, private facility, public sector outreach through LHWs and social marketing (Appendix, Table 3). That gave us a percentage of users currently availing themselves of modern FP resources through these four channels. Those percentages were then multiplied by the total population of MWRA to estimate the actual number of users being served through these channels. Then we calculated the number of MWRA that were served in the past 12 months, by excluding those current users, for example, who had received an IUCD or sterilization surgery in a previous year; they would continue to be counted among modern method users, albeit not a user of the service in the past 12 months.

We took current population growth rates of Pakistan (2.4%), Punjab (2.1%), Sindh (2.4%), KP (2.8%), Balochistan (3.3%) and Islamabad (4.8%) [15, 17], and applied linear growth assumptions to estimate total MWRA populations in 2025. We then estimated the number of additional users that must be reached by 2025 to achieve 50% CPR nationally, by excluding the number of users receiving FP services each year from the total estimated MWRA population that must be reached. We assumed that the total number of traditional method users may not change drastically by 2025 from its current number [10]. Binomial exact 95% confidence intervals were then calculated for these estimates. Finally, we calculated the percentage increase required to reach the national goal of 50% CPR by 2025, through all channels combined, and then through public and private facilities only. Then we converted the percentage increase to actual numbers to represent how many more MWRA users were needed to reach 50% CPR.

Results

The national CPR of 34.2% and 24.3% for modern methods translates into 11.3 million women who use any FP method and 8.2 million who use a modern method, respectively. Among these, 4.9 million had received FP services within the past 12 months, and therefore represent the total annual output of the FP service delivery system in Pakistan.

The 4.9 million women who currently use services for a modern method each year do so from one of the four primary channels. These include social marketing for self-procured short-term contraceptives from a store or pharmacy (2.702 million users), government outreach through LHWs (0.763 million users), and a public (0.877 million) or a private (0.553 million) healthcare provider or clinic (Table 1).

Table 1 Channels of modern FP methods and number of MWRA users (in millions)

Social marketing, or self-procured contraceptives, account for 55% of women served each year, followed by public facilities (18%) and then LHW outreach (15%) (Fig. 1). Private facilities, including social franchises, serve around 11% of users each year. Within these categories, there are minor variations among provinces; for example, Sindh has the largest share served by public facilities (25%). LHW outreach serves the fewest in Sindh (7%) and Balochistan (4%) and the highest in Punjab (20%). Corresponding users are shown in Table 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Share of MWRA served in the past year by source (%)

Table 2 shows current CPR, the targeted rates for CPR as recommended by the CCI, and the estimates of the number of total MWRA that must be served to reach the targets for 2025. To achieve the desired CPR, an estimated 20.02 million MWRA (8.76 million additional users) must be using some form of FP. Thus, the number of MWRA to be served to reach CCI-specified CPR targets must increase by 178% nationwide over the current number of FP users, or the current footprint of service delivery must expand by 1054% if one assumes that LHW outreach and social marketing are maximally utilized and will likely remain unchanged, and therefore that any changes can only come from public or private health facilities.

Table 2 MWRA users to be served by CCI targets (in millions)

Discussion

We use national survey data to depict the number of MWRA that must be served to reach national targets for CPR by 2025 and compare it against the current output of the healthcare delivery system. The comparison highlights the rather large gap between the current situation and the ask. More importantly, this framing is distinct from the current debate which revolves around raising CPR by a few percentage points each year.

Pakistan has seen a stagnant CPR for over two decades, despite moderate funding and considerable political support for FP. The major factors contributing to reluctance towards contraceptive use include lack of knowledge, lack of access to healthcare centres, familial restrictions, social constraints and clinical concerns regarding contraception [18]. Identifying the actual number of MWRA to be reached highlights both the immense gap between the current situation and the goal, but also helps identify which types of services, personnel and commodities to make available in which locations. This specificity is necessary since a tenfold increase in the number of MWRA to be served from the existing infrastructure asks vastly different questions than a marginal few percent changes. We discuss some of the options to meet this challenge based on national data.

In Pakistan, much of the advocacy has focused on increasing funding for FP. However, more than half of the government funding remains unutilized, and most public sector funds pay for salaries [19], while health facilities in the public or private sector are highly underutilized [9]. This means that conventional solution levers such as more funds, facilities, personnel or training will do little if funds are underspent and the trained personnel or new facilities are not visited by clients. Fortunately, this also highlights the considerable scope for scaling up services in both the public and private sectors, without requiring additional funds, facilities, personnel or training.

Annual data suggest that public sector outreach (LHW) [20, 21] and social marketing have been expanding very slowly, and may have reached a plateau relative to population [9,10,11,12, 22]. Hence, the only two channels where service delivery can expand are either public or private health facilities, which combined currently serve around 1.43 million MWRA each year [9], at an average of less than five FP clients a day (manuscript in preparation). The low utilization with high fixed costs also means that public sector facilities are expensive, at US$ 28 per user served per year, compared to private facilities [14, 23, 24].

To add nine million additional users, these facilities will have to expand their clientele by around tenfold. This increase may happen either spontaneously as clients recognize the need for FP and seek these services out, or they may be guided to the facilities through outreach. Several behavioural change communication programmes have attempted to increase the demand for FP [25, 26]. In national surveys, MWRA are consistently aware of the need for FP and different contraceptive methods available; however, knowledge does not translate consistently into actual use [10]. On the other hand, the use of outreach workers has been very successful in initiating MWRA into FP use and in guiding them to seek contraceptive services from facilities, as seen internationally [27, 28], as well as from Pakistan: the LHW programme [29, 30], Health and Nutrition Development Society (HANDS) MARVI [Marginalized Areas RH (Reproductive Health) and FP Viable Initiatives] workers project [31, 32], the Sukh Initiative [33] and the Akhter Hameed Khan Foundation (AHKF) Aapis Initiative [34]. FP driven by outreach workers often costs less than services through stand-alone facilities [23], and private sector outreach is cheaper than that in the public sector [14, 34,35,36,37].

Urban slums account for 30% of the population and are home to nearly half of all poor in Pakistan [38, 39]. These remain largely underserved by public or private programmes including FP [9]. And yet, CPR among urban poor is very similar to rural poor [10]. Given that urban poor are clustered close to each other and near many facilities, they are a large and easy-to-reach underserved population which can be targeted easily and at lower costs. Another important consideration may be to offer a more long-term product mix (such as implants, IUCDs and sterilization) to rural residents, since they are more difficult to reach, while urban residents may be offered a more diverse mix where frequent encounters with the health system will allow certain flexibility [40].

Supply of contraceptives across the country has been inconsistent [41, 42], and it contributes to facility underperformance and lowers client confidence, thereby lowering demand. The inconsistency stems partly from a sporadic lack of funding for products but is mostly due to delays in procurements and underutilization of funds [42, 43]. Some of the procurement issues may be addressed by leveraging the fact that population and FP are considered emergencies. The legal definition of such an emergency may be invoked to allow import of contraceptives from any country to lower tariffs and regulatory barriers to such imports and incentivize local manufacturing of some contraceptives through regulations where feasible.

Finally, although socially marketed supplies may appear to have saturated, this would be true under the assumptions of current demand for FP which depends on how couples perceive the need for more children, their own agency in managing their families, and how these intersect with their access and the ability or willingness to pay for these services. All of these may be modulated by effective behaviour change communication, resulting in increased demand for FP by couples [26], and in turn, leading to considerable expansion in the social marketing channel to meet this demand. There is some evidence that once couples become comfortable with the use of FP, they will continue to use and even pay for it [44]; however, more research is needed to understand the willingness to pay and price points for privately purchased contraception.

Demand creation remains a major gap. At the moment, it appears that while successful outreach and accessibility programmes tend to increase CPR in communities, often such uptake is short-lived and reverts once the programme concludes. In other words, the uptake is driven by supply with insufficient internal demand for contraception for many couples. This may be a contextual issue where the use of contraception will instil long-term usage behaviour [45]. In Pakistan, as in many developing countries, it appears that free supplies for health products such as contraceptives and vaccines are sometimes considered an imposition rather than a benefit and are often discounted in their value compared to commercially available goods. The roles of these conflicting and other issues are unclear in communities and require further research, which should complement and be embedded within current and future programmes. In fact, quick testing of discrete demand creation interventions to learn from the rapid-trial A/B testing paradigm from computers and social media may be made a routine part of programmes [46].

Recommendations for policy uptake

To reach 50% CPR by 2025, Pakistan will have to increase its quantum of services from public or private facilities by 14-fold. This increase will have to be supported by outreach that refers clients to public or private sector clinics, many of which are underutilized. Community-based, low-cost private sector outreach solutions are more cost-effective than the government’s LHW programme, which is now costly. While much private sector programming has been funded by donors, there are precedents for the public sector contracting of services to the private sector, such as the People’s Primary Healthcare Initiative (PPHI) and other models of contracting out government clinics to private entities [47]. Funding may be allocated to pay for outreach by the private sector, but without the high costs of the public sector. In fact, low-cost initiatives such as the AHKF model in urban settings [34] and the MARVI initiative in rural settings [31, 32] may be considered to benchmark costs of such contracting.

Urban slums are seldom served by public or private sector programmes and thus constitute a large and easy-to-reach yet underserved subgroup of the population. There are few clinics and seldom any outreach services in many urban slums, where population numbers are often underrepresented. On the other hand, distances are shorter. and even if facilities are not in particular neighbourhoods, they can be accessed relatively easily. They are underutilized either because clients do not know when to use them, that is, low demand for them, or because clients do not visit them because they find services and supplies inconsistent or of poor quality. Government can ensure commodity supplies through additional and earmarked funding for contraceptives and by lowering tariff or regulatory barriers to import or local manufacture of contraceptives. Quality may be improved through community feedback mechanisms that allow clinic managers to learn about and respond to client needs [48, 49].

Ultimately, FP in society will have to be client-driven to be sustainable. Some of this demand may be created through programming, such as outreach that highlights the need and means to clients, but more nuanced demand creation that is contextualized in cultural mores is needed through research and testing of discrete interventions within programmes and dedicated research into cultural constructs of FP use.

On the other hand, increased funding, training additional providers and opening new facilities are least likely to help add additional users in the initial phases, where optimization of existing resources is more warranted.

Limitations

This paper uses survey data from the Pakistan DHS 2017–18 and Population Census-2017 to estimate the number of women that use FP methods; thus the study is subject to the methodological limitations of these surveys, including over- or underrepresentation of certain provinces. The confidence interval may be large for some of the smaller provinces and less common service delivery channels.

Conclusions

We triangulated nationally available data to arrive at a discrete number of women that must be served to meet national goals. Given the persistent underutilization of funds and existing facilities, it is unlikely that increased funding for FP, more providers or training would help immediately. The most effective policy changes that will likely help include a shift in focus to urban slums, adding outreach (preferably private sector, given the high public sector outreach costs) for support and referral to existing public and private sector facilities, and ensuring that procurement of commodities is prioritized as a means to achieving a tenfold increase in the service delivery footprint of current facilities.

Availability of data and materials

The study uses request-based available data from the Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2017–18 (https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/3411), data from Population Census-2017 (https://www.pbs.gov.pk/content/final-results-census-2017-0), and CCI report (https://pakistan.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/briefing_note-target_setting_cci_recommendations-2020.pdf).

Abbreviations

CCI:

Council of Common Interests

CPR:

Contraceptive prevalence rate

FP:

Family planning

DHS:

Demographic and Health Survey

KP:

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

AJK:

Azad Jammu and Kashmir

GB:

Gilgit-Baltistan

MWRA:

Married women of reproductive age

LHW:

Lady health worker

IUCD:

Intrauterine contraceptive device

References

  1. Robinson WC, Ross JA. The global family planning revolution: three decades of population policies and programs. Washington: World Bank; 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. DaVanzo J, Adamson DM. Family planning in developing countries: an unfinished success story. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation; 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Nargund G. Declining birth rate in developed countries: a radical policy re-think is required. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2009;1(3):191–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nayab D. Demographic dividend or demographic threat in Pakistan. Pak Dev Rev. 2008;47(Spring):1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  5. PBS. Provisional Summary Results of 6th Population and Housing Census-2017. Islamabad: Pakistan Bureau of Statistics; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  6. World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights. New York: United Nations, 2019 ST/ESA/SER.A/423.

  7. Wazir MA, Alazar YM, Kadirov B. Family planning: smartest investment for achieving the sustainable developments goals for Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 2021;71:S12–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. UKAID, BMGF, WHO. London summit on family planning: summaries of commitments. 2012. Report No. 2012

  9. Khan AA. Family planning trends and programming in Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 2021;71(11):9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. National Institute of Population Studies P, DHSM. Pakistan demographic and health survey 2017–18. 2018. Report No. 2018

  11. National Institute of Population Studies P, DHSM. Pakistan demographic and health survey 2012–13. 2013. Report No. 10/2013

  12. National Institute of Population Studies P, DHS M. Pakistan demographic and health survey 2006–7. 2008. Report No. 6/2008

  13. Ali M, Azmat SK, Hamza HB. Assessment of modern contraceptives continuation, switching and discontinuation among clients in Pakistan: study protocol of 24-months post family planning voucher intervention follow up. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):359. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3156-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kamran I, Niazi R, Parveen T, Khan M, Khan K. Improving access to family planning services through the private sector in Pakistan a stakeholder analysis. Islamabad: Population Council; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  15. UNFPA. Provincial targets for the CCI Recommendations. Pakistan: UNFPA, 2020.

  16. PBS. Final Results of Census-2017: PBS; https://www.pbs.gov.pk/content/final-results-census-2017-0. Accessed 2022.

  17. Statistics PBo. 2017 census—area, population by sex, sex ratio, population density, urban proportion, household size and annual growth rate (Sindh). Islamabad: Pakistan Bureau of Statistics; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Imran M, Yasmeen R. Barriers to family planning in Pakistan. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2020;32(4):588–91.

    Google Scholar 

  19. UNFPA, NIDI. Resource Flow Survey on Family Planning in Pakistan 2019–20. 2021.

  20. Durrani A, O’Leary S, Javeed S, Jones S, Bashir A, Khurshid A. Lady Health worker programme, Pakistan: performance evaluation report. Oxford: Oxford Policy Management Group; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hunt S, Arif S, Malang I, Zulfiqar T, Wood P, Amin RA, et al. The third party evaluation of the lady health worker program. The Oxford Policy Management Group, 2009. Report No. 2009

  22. National Institute of Population Studies P. Pakistan demographic and health survey 1990–1. 1990. Report No. 1990

  23. Abbas K, Khan AA, Khan A. Costs and utilization of public sector family planning services in Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 2013;63(4 Suppl 3):S33–9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Khan AA, Shujaat K. Revisiting the costs and utilization of family planning services in the public sector in Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 2021;11(11):5.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Krenn S, Cobb L, Babalola S, Odeku M, Kusemiju B. Using behavior change communication to lead a comprehensive family planning program: the Nigerian Urban Reproductive Health Initiative. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014;2(4):427–43. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Skinner J, Hempstone H, Raney L, Galavotti C, Light B, Weinberger M, et al. Elevating social and behavior change as an essential component of family planning programs. Stud Fam Plann. 2021;52(3):383–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bang KS, Chae SM, Lee I, Yu J, Kim J. Effects of a community outreach program for maternal health and family planning in Tigray, Ethiopia. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2018;12(3):223–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2018.08.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. White JS, Speizer IS. Can family planning outreach bridge the urban-rural divide in Zambia? BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:143. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jalal S. The lady health worker program in Pakistan—a commentary. Eur J Pub Health. 2011;21(2):143–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckq199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hafeez A, Mohamud BK, Shiekh MR, Shah SA, Jooma R. Lady health workers programme in Pakistan: challenges, achievements and the way forward. JPakMedAssoc. 2011;61(3):210–5.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rahman M, Ahmed ST. ‘Where there’s a will, there’s a way’: The Supply Chain of MARVI Project, HANDS. SAJBMC. 2012;1(2):135–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277977912459437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sridharan S, Smith K. ADVANCING REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH IN PAKISTAN: A review of the David and Lucile Packard Foundation’s two decades of grantmaking. Pakistan: David and Lucile Packard Foundation, 2018. Report No. April 18 2022

  33. Najmi H, Ahmed H, Halepota GM, Fatima R, Ul Haq M, Yaqoob A, et al. Community-based integrated approach to changing women’s family planning behaviour in Pakistan, 2014–2016. Public Health Action. 2018;8(2):85–90. https://doi.org/10.5588/pha.17.0097.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Khan A, Khan A. Rural and Urban Labour Markets: What is Real, What are the Opportunities? Islamabad: SUCCESS; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lady Health Worker Programme. External evaluation of the national programme for family planning and primary health care—financial and economic analysis. Oxford: Oxford Policy Management; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Azmat SK, Ahmed S, Hameed W, Bilgrami M, Khan A, Khan AA, et al. Performance and measurement of a community-based distribution model of family planning services in Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 2013;63(4 Suppl 3):S40–5.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Khan A, Khan AA. A community driven model of family planning in low income urban communities. Akhter Hameed Khan resource center research and development solutions, 2019. Report No. 2019

  38. Ellis P, Roberts M. Leveraging urbanization in South Asia: managing spatial transformation for prosperity and livability. Washington: The World Bank; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Haque N. Pakistan urbanization: achieving progress and development through urban renewal. New York.: The Woodrow Wilson Center; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Vaaler ML, Kalanges LK, Fonseca VP, Castrucci BC. Urban-rural differences in attitudes and practices toward long-acting reversible contraceptives among family planning providers in Texas. Womens Health Issues. 2012;22(2):e157–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2011.11.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics. Contraceptive Performance Report 2017–2018. Islamabad, Pakistan: Ministry of Planning, Development and Reforms; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Shahzad K, Melkamu Y, Wazir A. Landscape analysis of contraceptive commodity security in Pakistan. UNFPA. 2020.

  43. Nishtar S, Amjad S, Sheikh S, Ahmad M. Synergizing health and population in Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 2009;59(9 Suppl 3):S3-23.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Khan A. A low-cost, high-coverage, urban outreach family planning program. Islamabad, Pakistan: Akhter Hameed Khan Resource Center; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Appadurai A. The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Austrian JA-O, Mendoza FA-O, Szerencsy AA-O, Fenelon LA-O, Horwitz LA-O, Jones SA-O, et al. Applying A/B testing to clinical decision support: rapid randomized controlled trials. (1438–8871 (Electronic)).

  47. Consultants S. Thrid party evaluation of the PPHI in Pakistan. 2011. Report No. 2011.

  48. Pandey P, Sehgal AR, Riboud M, Levine D, Goyal M. Informing resource-poor populations and the delivery of entitled health and social services in rural India: a cluster randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007;298(16):1867–75. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.16.1867.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. George AS, Mohan D, Gupta J, LeFevre AE, Balakrishnan S, Ved R, et al. Can community action improve equity for maternal health and how does it do so? Research findings from Gujarat, India. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2018;17(1):125. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0838-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MA and AdAK conceptualized and designed the study. MA and FB performed the formal analysis, and MA, FB, RK and AA wrote the manuscript. AaAK, FS and AdAK supervised the study, critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content, and AdAK revised the manuscript and provided family planning overview. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adnan Ahmad Khan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 3.

Table 3 Channels of FP methods currently being used

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdullah, M., Bilal, F., Khan, R. et al. Raising the contraceptive prevalence rate to 50% by 2025 in Pakistan: an analysis of number of users and service delivery channels. Health Res Policy Sys 21, 4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-022-00950-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-022-00950-y

Keywords