Skip to main content

Building Health Policy and Systems Research (HPSR) capacity in India: Reflections from the India HPSR fellowship program (2020–2023)

A Correction to this article was published on 03 October 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

Building capacity for Health Policy and Systems Research (HPSR) is critical for advancing the field in lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The India HPSR fellowship program is a home-grown capacity-building initiative, anchored at the Health Systems Transformation Platform (HSTP), New Delhi, and developed in collaboration with a network of institutes in India and abroad. In this practice-oriented commentary, we provide an overview of the fellowship program and critically reflect upon the learnings from working with three cohorts of fellows between 2020 and 2023. This commentary draws on routine program documentation (guidelines, faculty meeting reports, minutes of meetings of curricula and course development) as well as the perspectives of faculty and program managers associated with the fellowship. We have had several important learnings in the initial years of program implementation. One, it is important to iteratively modify globally available curricula and pedagogies on HPSR to suit country-specific requirements and include a strong component of ‘unlearning’ in such fellowships. Secondly, the goals of such fellowship programs need to be designed with country-specific contextual realities in mind. For instance, should publication of fellows’ work be an intended goal, then contextual deterrents to publication such as article processing fees, language barriers and work-related obligations of faculty and participants need to be addressed. Furthermore, to improve the policy translation of fellows’ work, such programs need to make broader efforts to strengthen research–policy–practice interfaces. Lastly, fellowship programs are cost-intensive, and outputs from them, such as papers or policy translation, are less immediate and less visible to donors. In the absence of these outputs, consistent funding can be a roadblock to sustaining these fellowships in LMICs. The experience of our fellowship program suggests that LMIC-led capacity-building initiatives on HPSR have the potential to influence changes in health systems and build the capacity of researchers to generate evidence for policy-making. The sharing of resources and teaching material through the fellowship can enable learning for all institutions involved. Furthermore, such initiatives can serve as a launchpad for the creation of regional and international HPSR communities of practice, with a focus on LMICs, thereby challenging epistemic injustice in teaching and learning HPSR.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Strong health systems are essential for improving health outcomes in populations, reducing health inequities and making progress on the Sustainable Development Goals [1, 2]. However, timely and context-sensitive evidence that is needed for strengthening policies and systems is often lacking in lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [3, 4]. Health Policy and Systems Research (HPSR) is a field that seeks to fill this need for contextually relevant, actionable evidence for strengthening systems and improving policy processes [5]. Beyond generating evidence sensitive to context and keeping people at the centre of change, HPSR aims to effect structural change as well as intervene upon the ‘soft’ aspects of health policies and systems. HPSR draws from multiple disciplines with an explicit commitment to social justice and equity [6]. Experiences across LMICs have demonstrated, to varying degrees, the influence of HPSR in bridging the gap between the research, policy and practice worlds [7, 8].

While HPSR as an evolving field faces many challenges, building capacity to conduct HPSR has been a key constraint globally [9, 10]. This is partly because the field is diverse and multidisciplinary, with fuzzy boundaries. Being a field of inquiry defined on the basis of solving a given health system problem, there is often a lack of standardized methodological templates for HPSR studies. Furthermore, building research capacities in LMICs has usually been helmed by actors and agencies from high-income countries (HIC). The problems with such a system of capacity-building are manifold: research-oriented courses are often costly for candidates from LMICs to enrol in, there is less contextualization of curricula and there are possible misalignments between the skills taught and the skills needed to do research in LMICs [11, 12]. Given these issues, it is clear that a field such as HPSR needs domestic LMIC-led capacity-building initiatives that are designed purposefully in consideration of national and sub-national contexts.

The India HPSR fellowship program (2020–2023) is one such home-grown effort at HPSR capacity-building. Anchored at the Health Systems Transformation Platform (HSTP) in India, it collaborates with a network of institutes across the globe. The program was designed as a platform for developing a collective understanding of HPSR contextualized to India’s needs to encourage the production of knowledge in this region. In this commentary, we present the rationale, design and functioning of the program and critically reflect upon the learnings so far. The aim of this commentary is to inspire and inform other such LMIC-led efforts at building HPSR capacity locally and regionally. “We” refers to all of us involved in the design and implementation of the fellowship (course coordinators, advisors and faculty).

For writing this reflective essay, S.J. collated a set of documents that were produced during the course of the program (2020–2023). These documents comprised (a) program development documents (two academic committee meeting reports involving external HPSR experts), (b) curriculum and design-related documents (minutes of one advisory committee meeting, three selection committee meetings, and eleven faculty meetings and (c) implementation-related documents (one report on the fellows’ accolades and achievements during/after the fellowship and minutes of Secretariat operational meetings). S.J. and S.R. prepared a preliminary summary analysis, which was then shared with all faculty who are authors. All faculty members worked further on this, deepening and expanding on the conceptual areas in the paper. As a final step, once the paper was drafted, it was sent to two HPSR experts, one Indian and one global, for their input (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Methods (with additional details provided in A.1. Supplementary File)

The rationale for focused HPSR training in India

Indian context

Much of public health training in India currently happens in medical schools, as part of post-graduate degrees in community medicine, and largely employs a biomedical lens [13]. In the last two decades, public health schools with an interdisciplinary focus have been steadily increasing in number [14]. However, our experience suggests that rigorous training to conduct research on health policy and health systems is still sparse in both medical and public health schools in India. For instance, of approximately 500 courses on public health and management in India listed on two websites [15, 16], less than 30 explicitly mentioned having a teaching module (or sub-module) on health policy and/or health systems research. The authors of this paper have frequently noted that public health stakeholders in India, including senior policy-makers, use the terms “health system” and “government health services” interchangeably. Given this, the paucity of peer-reviewed outputs from India on health policy and systems is not surprising; Rao et al. found just 314 papers discussing various aspects of health systems in India [17]. Another review noted that 90% of articles published in India between 2000 and 2010 on public health were focused on individual diseases [18], as opposed to broader topics of health systems strengthening.

Philosophy and origin

The India HPSR fellowship program began in 2020 with the intention of addressing the above-stated issues in the country. The program was conceived against the backdrop of ongoing global discussions on epistemic injustice in knowledge production [19]. It has been noted that research outputs are frequently focused on issues that are more prevalent in HICs, while research needs in LMICs remain unmet [20]. Furthermore, evidence from research often remains delinked from policy-making [21]. The India HPSR program was launched with the aim of promoting fairer knowledge practices by, firstly, strengthening ties between academicians and policy-makers in the country and, secondly, breaking hierarchies among different disciplines of researchers in the country (medical, anthropological, sociological, finance and others) to encourage research that has meaning in the real world.

The India HPSR program is anchored by the HSTP, New Delhi. It has been jointly developed by and is being delivered in collaboration with the Institute of Public Health, Bengaluru, India (IPH); Sree Chitra Thirunal Institute of Medical Sciences & Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, India (SCTIMST); Christian Medical College, Vellore, India (CMC); The George Institute for Global Health, New Delhi, India (TGI); Nossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Australia (UOM); and the Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp (ITM) Fig. 2). The fellowship is supported by Tata Trusts, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) and Access Health International. More details about the design and implementation of the program are discussed below. We have also attached supplementary material on the processes followed prior to the initiation of the program (A.2. Overview of India HPSR Fellowship Program in Supplementary File).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The India HPSR program network

Overview of the India HPSR fellowship program

The India HPSR program takes a two-level approach to capacity-building. At the individual level, the program aims to develop the capacity of researchers from different disciplinary backgrounds to conduct HPSR. At the collective level, it aims to build a network of HPSR experts across key institutions in academic, research and policy settings in the country and abroad. The fellowship program, spread over 18–24 months, uses a blended training approach and comprises of three components:

  1. (a)

    An initial face-to-face session

  2. (b)

    A 6-month online learning phase with five modules culminating in a synthesis workshop

  3. (c)

    A 12-month grant for the fellow to independently conduct an HPSR study.

Figure 3 summarizes the course structure of the program.

Fig. 3
figure 3

India HPSR Fellowship Course structure

The 5-day introductory face-to-face session was introduced in 2022 for the second cohort [due to coronavirus disease (COVID-19), this session was not conducted for the first cohort]. This introductory component gave participants an overview of the HPSR learnings to follow, helping to create a sense of community among them. The face-to-face session is followed by a 6–8-month online learning phase delivered through a dedicated learning management system. All five modules are conducted in an interactive manner and include lectures, practical exercises, online discussion forums, discussion of peer-reviewed literature, assignments and interactions with global experts. Participant-centred learning outcomes have been defined for all the modules (A.3. Course Curriculum in Supplementary File). Upon completion of the modules, each fellow undertakes an HPSR study independently. Before beginning their study, fellows present their proposals to a jury consisting of course faculty as well as external HPSR specialists. Thereafter, successful candidates are awarded a fellowship research grant and paired with global HPSR mentors. At the end of 12 months, a fellow who completes their research and submits a report is certified as an HPSR fellow.

Reflections on program design and implementation

The India HPSR fellowship program was developed with extensive input from Indian and global experts who have been instrumental in building the field of HPSR. The initial curriculum was developed following two rounds of discussion with both national and international experts in 2020 [22, 23]. The long fellowship duration (18–24 months) allowed fellows to participate at their own pace. This duration was consistent with the thinking that, while short-term courses have their place, long-term engagement and comprehensive efforts would be more useful in advancing HPSR thinking [24].

Through a carefully crafted set of criteria and a multi-round screening process, our participants have been selected from diverse backgrounds across the country (Fig. 4). India is a diverse country with several disparities in human development across and within states [25]. In the spirit of promoting fairer knowledge practices, we purposively selected candidates to ensure geographical diversity in the fellowship. We also gave preference to candidates who expressed interest in conducting contextually relevant research in tribal and remote locations that tend to be under-researched. This manner of selection led to a geographically diverse group of candidates in the program who had varying competencies and levels of exposure to research. Some of our candidates needed more support than others to complete the course requirements. We tried our best to accommodate requests for additional online mentoring and individualized coaching for candidates who requested support.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Distribution of India HPSR fellows

Equal importance was placed in the program on building individual capacities and developing the potential of selected fellows to build capacities within their institutions. The idea was for these individuals to become important change agents and leaders in HPSR by adopting research and teaching approaches that they have learnt during the fellowship, within their institutions and more broadly in the Indian context. We have captured the reflections of faculty on the details of design and implementation of the program in Table 1. Figure 5 depicts demographic details of the India HPSR fellows. Figure 6 depicts the current status of the fellows’ participation in the program.

Table 1 Reflections on program design and implementation [C1 - Cohort 1 (2021); C2- Cohort 2 (2022); C3 -Cohort 3 (2023)]
Fig. 5
figure 5

Demographics of India HPSR fellows

Fig. 6
figure 6

Status of India HPSR fellowship cohorts

Reflections on the strides made and challenges faced by the program

In this section, we critically reflect on the three initial years of the fellowship. Global thinking suggests that HPSR capacity-building efforts need to be directed not only at individuals but also at the level of organizations and systems (the collective) [26]. In line with these, we share our thoughts on the strides made as well as the challenges faced at both the individual and the collective level in the HPSR fellowship.

Faculty reflections on capacity-building efforts made at individual level

Different ways of thinking and career opportunities among participants

Box 1 is a summary of faculty reflections on “different ways of thinking” inculcated during the fellowship. Although some of these may seem self-evident, we believe these were important insights for freshers to HPSR in the country. Many of our participants are from institutions with strong organizational hierarchies and are exposed predominantly to positivist research paradigms. Other paradigms of research with different ontological, epistemological and methodological perspectives were new to many participants, despite their important role in building knowledge on health policies and systems. A key milestone for many participants was to be able to see health policy and/or systems ‘problems’ as more than epidemiological patterns and to embrace the complexities of health policies and systems, as well as to be able to critically reflect on health policies and systems. It took some time for participants to see ‘problems’ as more than just epidemiological concerns, to accept the complexities of HPSR, and to actively engage in reflection.

Faculty reflections on efforts made by the program at the ‘collective’ level

Building an India-centric HPSR network

In contrast to many international fellowships, the India HPSR fellowship is a ‘home-grown’ initiative. It has brought like-minded people across the globe together and built a network of people in the field. The sharing of resources and teaching material through the fellowship has contributed to learning for all institutions involved in the program.

In India, at present, there are few formal networks that connect HPS researchers across different teaching and research institutions. While initiatives in Africa such as the Consortium for Health Policy and Systems Analysis in Africa (CHEPSAA) [39], Collaboration for Health Systems Analysis and Innovation [40] or West African Network of Emerging Leaders [41] have built collaborative networks of regional HPS researchers, such systematic, at-scale efforts have so far been missing in India. To the best of our knowledge, the Keystone Initiative has been one of the only previous efforts that explicitly focused on HPSR capacity-building and networking in India. This initiative was anchored at the Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI). It focused on developing capacities for HPSR through a 2-week participatory training course, followed by ongoing networking [42].

The above suggests that there is a strong need for building an India-centric HPSR network. For most part, in India, people working on policy and systems-related issues are based across institutions and less connected through formal collaborations. While networking initiatives such as the Implementation Research for Health Systems Strengthening (IR-HSS) do exist, ones that explicitly focus on HPSR capacity-building are largely missing at present. The Health Systems Research India Initiative (HSRII), set up in 2010, is an e-group of researchers and practitioners with the primary objective of disseminating issues related to HPSR  in India. In 2022, the India Health Systems Collaborative (IHSC) was initiated by the BMGF in an attempt to “provide an interdisciplinary platform for collaborative research” [43]. Initially, they had financed health systems research on specific topics, for example, primary health care and health care financing. However, overall, there have been fewer opportunities for sharing pedagogical content and joint mentoring, leading to a relative insularity of expertise. The India HPSR fellowship has fostered the establishment of a network of HPS researchers in the country.

Furthermore, there was recognition that a critical mass of people is needed to drive change in any given institution. This idea has been advocated by the postdoctoral fellowship on HPSR in Africa as well [30]. To achieve a critical mass, we have purposefully selected, over the three cohorts, fellows who can be change agents to build the HPSR field in their own institutions. Fellows in teaching positions have shared that the fellowship experience has helped them modify the nature of research teaching within their own institutions. Fellows across institutions too have come together through the fellowship and established informal communication channels (chat groups, email listservs and others). The challenge, in the near future, is two-fold: first, to expand and grow this network and, second, to maintain the momentum for networking generated through the fellowship experience.

On stakeholder support, recognition and resources

The first few years of the India HPSR program has had strong supporters, well-wishers and funders. The program has gained global attention and collaborations from the best in the field. In the annual Melbourne School of Population and Global Health teaching excellence awards (December 2023), the program won an award for impact in the area of engagements and partnerships.

However, to build upon these achievements, more support and resources are needed. First, there is a need to generate more resources for the fellowship program. More cohorts of fellows are needed to work towards developing a critical mass of HPSR change agents in the country. Second, and more broadly, funding is needed to create more opportunities for undertaking HPSR within India. It has been noted that the majority of funding for HPSR comes from international development partners and less from domestic or government sources [44, 45]. This manner of funding has also contributed to research that is more focused  on global rather than domestic issues, with fewer avenues for translation [46]. In cognizance of these issues, we feel the need to work more closely with existing government research and training organizations within India, such as the Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR), the National Health Systems Resource Centre (NHSRC), and the State Health Systems Resource Centres (SHSRC).

Scope and limitations of this paper

This commentary provides an overview of the India HPSR fellowship program and captures learnings from the initial years of the program. The paper has some limitations. For one, the voices of fellows have not been explicitly considered. Secondly, we have not yet conducted a formal evaluation, which is planned for the next phase of the program. For writing this piece, we have predominantly relied on pre-existing documentation and experience-sharing by faculty and senior management. Given these limitations, the commentary’s purview is limited to introducing the program and offering some practice-oriented reflections to those keen to start similar initiatives.

The need for documenting experiential learnings from HPSR fellowships in LMICs

In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of LMIC-led HPSR papers. [47]. Developing more capacity to carry out HPSR in LMICs is crucial to sustaining this trend. LMIC-led fellowship programs have been proffered as a solution to augment existing capacity for HPSR in these settings. However, publications and documented experience-sharing from LMIC capacity-building programs on HPSR have been limited. Some learnings from the post-doctoral fellowship in Africa [30], the Health Policy Analysis fellowship for doctoral researchers in LMICs [48] and the earlier career women mentorship program in HPSR have been documented [49]. However, from the South Asian region explicitly, we did not come across published literature on HPSR capacity-building initiatives. From India, we know only of the Keystone Initiative that targeted capacity-building in HPSR for working professionals [42]. The online repository from this initiative, available online, was very useful to us as we planned our program.

Our commentary attempts to fill an important gap in documentation of capacity-building efforts from the South Asian geography. Though not an evaluation, it describes the fellowship program we developed and captures initial learnings that could be useful to others attempting capacity-building in HPSR for working professionals.

Conclusions

Early reflections from programs such as ours can offer practical guidance for others attempting comparable HPSR capacity-building programs. In keeping with these thoughts, we summarize below some of the early learnings from the roll-out of our program:

  • Fellowship programs must focus not only on giving participants a ‘flavour’ of HPSR but also enhancing people’s learning and unlearning capacities, a founding aspect of “learning health systems” [50]. If fellowship programs are to be truly multidisciplinary, then the participants of such programs must be encouraged to shed their disciplinary baggage. Unlearning becomes crucial to this process.

  • There is a need to adapt pedagogies and curricula iteratively in the initial years of HPSR fellowship programs to suit national and sub-national contexts. In our case, as compared with previous iterations, the current course material is more applied and relevant to real-world research settings in India.

  • The goals of fellowship programs must be aligned with contextual realities. If publications and other scholarly outputs are desired from such programs, several contextual deterrents – article processing fees, participants’ non-familiarity with the publication process, language barriers and other work commitments of faculty and participants [32, 34] – need to be addressed.

  • Fellowship programs can provide a great platform to network with people, local and global, who are passionate advocates of HPSR. Other training experiences have noted this as well [51].The important challenge is to expand and sustain these networks beyond the training period.

  • Fellowships need to make broader efforts to strengthen research–policy–practice interfaces in LMICs since these are traditionally weak in such settings [37, 38]. Policy translation of research gets limited in the absence of these interfaces.

  • Lastly, sustained funding can be a critical bottleneck to the success of such programs. Fellowship programs are cost-intensive, and at the same time, anticipated outputs – such as publications and dashing examples of policy translation – are less visible immediately. The lack of visible outputs can act as a deterrent to sustained funding. Also, more domestic funding needs to be made available and tapped for such fellowships; this will not only enable the sustainability of HPSR capacity building initiatives, but also ensure that the research done aligns with national and sub-national priorities.

We believe that the biggest strength of the India HPSR fellowship program is that it highlights the feasibility of LMIC-led capacity-building initiatives on HPSR. Such initiatives are particularly lacking in South Asia at scale. Programs such as ours have the potential to inculcate new thinking in participants, help fellows gain practical experience working in HPSR, and open more avenues for career advancements. Furthermore, such capacity-building programs can act as a springboard for developing local and global communities of practice on HPSR. In the long run, such programs can become important channels to challenge the prevailing epistemic injustice in teaching and learning HPSR.

Availability of data and materials

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Change history

Abbreviations

HPSR:

Health Policy and Systems Research

LMIC:

Lower- and middle-income countries

HSTP:

Health Systems Transformation Platform

HIC:

High-income countries

IPH:

Institute of Public Health

SCTIMST:

Sree Chitra Thirunal Institute of Medical Sciences & Technology

CMC:

Christian Medical College

TGI:

The George Institute for Global Health

NIGH:

Nossal Institute for Global Health

ITM:

Institute of Tropical Medicine

BMGF:

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

C1:

Cohort 1

C2:

Cohort 2

C3:

Cohort 3

CHEPSAA:

Consortium for Health Policy and Systems Analysis in Africa

PHFI:

Public Health Foundation of India

IR-HSS:

Implementation Research for Health Systems Strengthening

HSRII:

Health Systems Research India Initiative

IHSC:

India Health Systems Collaborative

HPS:

Health Policy and Systems

ICMR:

Indian Council for Medical Research

NHSRC:

National Health Systems Resource Centre

SHSRC:

State Health Systems Resource Centre

References

  1. Kieny MP, Bekedam H, Dovlo D, Fitzgerald J, Habicht J, Harrison G, et al. Strengthening health systems for universal health coverage and sustainable development. Bull World Health Organ. 2017;95(7):537–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kruk ME, Gage AD, Arsenault C, Jordan K, Leslie HH, Roder-DeWan S, et al. High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6: e1196.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Oxman AD, Lavis JN, Lewin S, Fretheim A. SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed health policymaking (STP) 1: what is evidence-informed policymaking? Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;7(S1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shroff Z, Aulakh B, Gilson L, Agyepong IA, El-Jardali F, Ghaffar A. Incorporating research evidence into decision-making processes: researcher and decision-maker perceptions from five low- and middle-income countries. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alliance for health policy and systems research WHO. What is health policy and systems research. https://ahpsr.who.int/what-we-do/what-is-health-policy-and-systems-research-(hpsr). Accessed 15 Dec 2023.

  6. Gilson L. Health policy and systems research: a methodology reader-the Abridged version. 2012.

  7. Sales RK, Reyes-Ramos GK, de Veyra C, Gascon G, Barraca V, Garcia G, et al. Advancing health through evidence assisted decisions with health policy and systems research program: a qualitative evaluation of a national health research grant management process in the Philippines. Health Res Policy Syst. 2023;21(1):73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Strachan DL, Teague K, Asefa A, Annear PL, Ghaffar A, Shroff ZC, et al. Using health policy and systems research to influence national health policies: lessons from Mexico, Cambodia and Ghana. Health Policy Plan. 2023;38:3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. World Health Organization. World report on health policy and systems research. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mirzoev T, Topp SM, Afifi RA, Fadlallah R, Obi FA, Gilson L. Conceptual framework for systemic capacity strengthening for health policy and systems research. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7: e009764.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Murray M, Mubiligi J. An approach to building equitable global health research collaborations. Ann Glob Health. 2020;86:1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Svadzian A, Vasquez NA, Abimbola S, Pai M. Global health degrees: at what cost? BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5: e003310.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Zodpey SP, Negandhi H, Yeravdekar R. Future directions for public health education reforms in India. Front Public Health. 2014;2:68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Negandhi H, Sharma K, Zodpey S. History and evolution of public health education in India. Indian J Public Health. 2012;56(1):12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. National health systems resource centre (NHSRC) M of H& FW. Public health education courses and institutes, National health systems resource centre. https://nhsrcindia.org/public-health-education-courses-and-institutes. Accessed 15 Dec 2023.

  16. Health Systems Global (HSG). Health policy and systems research training database. https://courses.healthsystemsglobal.org/courses. Accessed 15 Dec 2023.

  17. Rao KD, Arora R, Ghaffar A. Health systems research in the time of health system reform in India: a review. Health Res Policy Syst. 2014;12(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kalita A, Shinde S, Patel V. Public health research in India in the new millennium: a bibliometric analysis. Glob Health Action. 2015;8(1):27576.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Abimbola S, Pai M. Will global health survive its decolonisation? Lancet. 2020;396(10263):1627–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yegros-Yegros A, van de Klippe W, Abad-Garcia MF, Rafols I. Exploring why global health needs are unmet by research efforts: the potential influences of geography, industry and publication incentives. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020;18(1):47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Shroff Z, Aulakh B, Gilson L, Agyepong IA, El-Jardali F, Ghaffar A. Incorporating research evidence into decision-making processes: researcher and decision-maker perceptions from five low- and middle-income countries. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13(1):70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. HSTP. Expert consultation to review the design of India health policy and systems research fellowship program. 2020. https://www.hstp.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/expert-consultation-to-review-the-design-of-india-hpsr-fellowship-program-24-june-2020.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2024.

  23. HSTP. Meeting to Review the Design of India Health Policy & Systems Research Fellowship Program. 2020. https://www.hstp.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/hstp-iph-meeting-to-review-the-design-of-india-hpsr-fellowship-program-21-august-2020.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2024.

  24. Bennett S, Agyepong IA, Sheikh K, Hanson K, Ssengooba F, Gilson L. Building the field of health policy and systems research: an agenda for action. PLoS Med. 2011;8(8): e1001081.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. James KS, Rajan Irudaya S, Goli Srinivas. Economic and political weekly. Demographic and Health Diversity in the Era of SDGs. 2020. https://www.epw.in/journal/2020/6/national-family-health-survey-4/demographic-and-health-diversity-era-sdgs.html. Accessed 24 Aug 2024.

  26. Brady L, Gilson L, Olivier J, Orgill M, Shung-King M, Whyle E, et al. “Not just a journal club – it’s where the magic happens”: knowledge mobilization through co-production for health system development in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(3):323–33.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Akgün AE, Byrne JC, Lynn GS, Keskin H. Organizational unlearning as changes in beliefs and routines in organizations. J Organ Chang Manag. 2007;20(6):794–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Joo JH, Kim JA, Liao JM. The case for unlearning health systems. Healthcare. 2022;10(4): 100661.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Coombs C, Hislop D, Holland J, Bosley S, Manful E. Exploring types of individual unlearning by local health-care managers: an original empirical approach. Health Serv Del Res. 2013;1(2):1–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lembani M, Teddy G, Molosiwa D, Hwabamungu B. Post-doctoral research fellowship as a health policy and systems research capacity development intervention: a case of the CHESAI initiative. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;14(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hommes F, Monzó HB, Ferrand RA, Harris M, Hirsch LA, Besson EK, et al. The words we choose matter: recognising the importance of language in decolonising global health. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(7):e897–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Adebisi YA, Jimoh ND, Ogunkola IO, Ilesanmi EA, Elhadi YAM, Lucero-Prisno DE. Addressing language inequities in global health science scholarly publishing. J Med Surg Pub Health. 2024;2: 100038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Abimbola S. The foreign gaze: Authorship in academic global health. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4: e002068.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. The Lancet Global Health. Global health 2021: who tells the story? Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9: e99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schleiff MJ, Rangnekar A, Gomez FO, Teddy G, Peters DH, Balabanova D. Towards core competencies for health policy and systems research (HPSR) training: results from a global mapping and consensus-building process. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(7):1058–68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Green A, Bennett S. Sound choices: enhancing capacity for evidence-informed health policy. 2007.

  37. Shroff Z, Javadi D, Gilson L. Institutional capacity to generate and use evidence in LMICs: current state and opportunities for HPSR. BMC Health Res Pol Syst. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0261-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. English KM, Pourbohloul B. Increasing health policy and systems research capacity in low- and middle-income countries: results from a bibliometric analysis. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15(1):64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. The Centre for Health Policy U of W. Consortium for health policy and systems analysis in Africa CHEPSAA. https://www.chp.ac.za/Research/Consortium-for-Health-Policy-and-Systems-Analysis-in-Africa-CHEPSAA. Accessed on 15 Dec 2023.

  40. Collaboration for health systems analysis and innovation (CHESAI), IDRC–International development research centre. https://idrc-crdi.ca/en/project/collaboration-health-systems-analysis-and-innovation-chesai. Accessed 15 Dec 2023.

  41. WANEL–West African network of emerging leaders. https://wanelhps.org/. Accessed 15 Dec 2023.

  42. Garimella S, Raman V, Varghese J, Sheikh K. The keystone HPSR short course: developing capacities for policy-relevant health policy and systems research. BMJ. 2016;1:A36.2-A37.

    Google Scholar 

  43. India Health Systems Collaborative. www.ihsc.org. Accessed 13 Mar 2024.

  44. Grépin KA, Pinkstaff CB, Shroff ZC, Ghaffar A. Donorfunding health policy and systems research in low- and middle-income countries: how much, from where and to whom. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lamba G, Dal Zennaro L, Ha S, Yangchen S. Domestic funding for health policy and systems research: why is it invisible? Public Health Res Pract. 2021;31(4):e3142117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Morankar S, Abraham G, Shroff Z, Birhanu Z. “Research ends with publication”: a qualitative study on the use of health policy and systems research in Ethiopia. Health Res Policy Syst. 2024;22(1):1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. English KM, Pourbohloul B. Health policy and systems research collaboration pathways: lessons from a network science analysis. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15(1):71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Alliance for health policy and systems research. Analysing the politics of policy change. 2021. https://ahpsr.who.int/newsroom/news/item/02-06-2021-analysing-the-politics-of-policy-change. Accessed 24 Aug 2024.

  49. Jalaghonia N, Kwamie A. Making progress in early-career publishing: evolutions of the women’s publication mentorship programme. Health Policy Plan. 2023;38:II72–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Sheikh K, Abimbola S. Learning health systems: pathways to progress. Flagship report of the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research. https://ahpsr.who.int/publications/i/item/learning-health-systems-pathways-to-progress. Accessed 13 Mar 2024.

  51. Tancred TM, Schleiff M, Peters DH, Balabanova D. Formation à la recherche sur les politiques et les systèmes de santé: État des lieux à l’échelle internationale et recommandations. Bull World Health Organ. 2016;94(7):491–500.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr Rakesh Parashar and Dr Kerry Scott for their valuable comments on the manuscript.

Funding

The India Health Policy and Systems Research (HPSR) fellowship program is supported by Tata Trusts, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Access Health International. There was no additional funding to synthesize this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.J. and S.R. prepared a preliminary summary analysis and wrote the main manuscript text, which was then shared with all authors. S.M.A., S.K., D.L., P.N.S., D.N., S.V.B., B.M., R.S. and N.D. reviewed the manuscript, deepening and expanding on the conceptual areas in the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shilpa John.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: Fig. 2 had a black rectangle inserted that partially obscured the image.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

John, S., Ramani, S., Abbas, S.M. et al. Building Health Policy and Systems Research (HPSR) capacity in India: Reflections from the India HPSR fellowship program (2020–2023). Health Res Policy Sys 22, 129 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01218-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01218-3